| Akali camps
        evolving strategies
 Two-day
        Vidhan Sabha session opens today
 By P P S
        Gill
 Tribune News Service
 CHANDIGARH, Dec 20 
        While the two-day winter session of the Punjab Vidhan
        Sabha starting here tomorrow may give a temporary
        reprieve to the SAD-BJP government and save it from
        possible embarrassment inside the House, the political
        temperature outside the Assembly continues to rise. The government does not
        seem to have much of legislative business to transact in
        the House, but there is enough of politicking, involving
        the Chief Minister, Mr Parkash Singh Badal (he is also
        SAD President) and the SGPC President, Mr Gurcharan Singh
        Tohra, outside the House. The Minister of
        Parliamentary Affairs, Mr Madan Mohan Mittal, informs TNS
        there is not much of legislative business excepting
        introduction of some bills or amendments. The House will
        see swearing-in of the new Congress MLA, Mr Kanwaljit
        Singh Lalli, and also make obituary references on the
        opening day. The business is to be taken up only the next
        day. Whereas tactical moves and
        technicalities like issue of a showcause notice to the
        SGPC President by the SAD Disciplinary Action Committee
        notwithstanding both camps, pro-Badal and pro-Tohra camps
        are engaged in consultations evolving
        "strategies" to meet the possible
        religio-political expediencies, which may surface in the
        foreseeable future. Both sides want to forestall any
        developments which may impinge upon their strategies. It
        is the question of the fittest now. Of the listed bills the
        major one is on municipalities for which a new bill is to
        be introduced. Other small items of legislative business
        pertain to infrastructural development cess, general
        sales tax, road development board and making it eligible
        for raising loans etc. says Mr Mittal. This session of the Vidhan
        Sabha comes at a time when the two major political
        parties, the Shiromani Akali Dal ( senior partner in the
        coalition government with the Bharatiya Janata Party) and
        the Congress party have undergone change of complexion. The SAD is engrossed in an
        internal crisis with external consequences following
        no-holds barred fight between the Chief Minister (as also
        the SAD President), Mr Parkash Singh Badal, and the SGPC
        President, Mr Gurcharan Singh Tohra. This has already
        taken a toll of five members of the council of ministers:
        Mr Mahesh Inder Singh Grewal, Mr Manjit Singh Calcutta,
        Mr Harmail Singh Tohra  all Cabinet rank,  Mr
        Inderjit Singh Zira and Mr S S Kohli, both ministers of
        state. The Congress has also
        undergone a kind of metamorphosis since the last sitting
        of the House. The Punjab Pradesh Congress President, who
        also happened to be the leader of the party's legislature
        wing as well as of the Opposition, Ms Rajinder Kaur
        Bhattal, has been replaced. While Capt Amarinder Singh
        has stepped in as PPCC President, Chaudhary Jagjit Singh
        is now the CLP leader, When contacted, Chaudhary
        Jagjit Singh dubbed the "one-day" session as a
        "cruel joke." He regretted that the members had
        not received any agenda or copy of legislative business
        to be conducted on Tuesday. His understanding was that
        certain bills or amendments thereto were being presented.
        But copies, thereof, had not been made available".
        The same should have been supplied when the notice
        summoning the House was served on the members," he
        added. Chaudhary Jagjit Singh
        wondered how the government expected the members to do a
        proper reading of the bills. It only showed that the
        government wanted to "avoid facing" the
        Opposition or give it an opportunity to raise pertinent
        issues on the floor of the House. Those issues were of
        great concern to the people of the state. The winter
        session, he went on, should last longer to enable the
        Opposition to raise its voice, articulate the aspirations
        of the electorate, and discuss some of the burning issues
        confronting the people. When asked to identify
        those issues, he mentioned "price rise, galloping
        inflation (which is strangulating the consumers), the
        neglect of the employees and the financial health of
        Punjab", which has taken the state to the brink of
        near bankruptcy. The Congress leader felt
        convening of a short sitting of the House only showed the
        "failure" of the SAD-BJP government in giving
        people their due and elected representatives an
        opportunity to speak. When the House assembles
        tomorrow, it will do so in the shadow of Adampur's
        humiliating defeat which has proved to be nemesis for
        SAD, which is embroiled in a bitter internecine war,
        beginning at the top. Chaudhary Jagjit Singh refused to
        comment on what is going on inside the SAD. But Mr Mittal
        when asked to comment said for the BJP, being a coalition
        partner both in Chandigarh and New Delhi, it is a"
        wait and watch" situation. he hoped the internal
        strife would end soon in the larger interest of the state
        and the people, who have warmly responded to the working
        together of the two political parties, "which in
        itself signals communal amity and understanding". The present numerical
        line-up in the House is as follows: SAD 74, BJP 18;
        Congress 15; CPI 2; SAD ( led by Mr Simranjit Singh Mann)
        1, and BSP 1. There are six Independents. From all available
        accounts it seems there is hardly any business with the
        government to conduct. Moreover, practically a one day
        session(so far) will barely give the Opposition an
        opportunity to talk of "corruption, crop failure and
        harassment of farmers in mandis, poor tax realisation in
        the state, development being at a stand-still, financial
        crisis etc", as the CPI MLA, Mr Hardev Arshi, put
        it. He lamented that the SAD-BJP government had made a
        "mockery" of running the government. It has
        totally alienated itself from the grassroots. The present
        Badal-Tohra feud was also fraught with dangers unless
        resolved. Within the Vidhan Sabha
        SAD does not see any reason why the five Ministers or
        MLAs would cause any problems. No one among them is
        opposed to the SAD Government or will work against it.
        The resignation was only to register a
        "protest", probably to exert
        "pressure" on the SAD President.  As part of the strategy
        being evolved to keep religious edicts out of the way,
        possibility of a presidium being formed by the SAD
        President to direct the future course of action is not
        being ruled out. Outside the House the
        Chief Minister has already had several rounds of
        discussions with his close confidants, who continued to
        delineate on the various consequences late on Saturday
        night. The main theme being to "wait and watch"
        how Jathedar of Akal Takht acts following his
        "appeal" and to pre-empt any move by him. The
        SGPC chief is already piqued over the continued sniper
        fire on him, while, Mr Parkash Singh is known to have
        "bypassed" the Akal Takht earlier also in 1994. The SGPC President, Mr
        Gurcharan Singh Tohra, was in Chandigarh (SAS Nagar to be
        precise) early this morning. He was on his way to
        Ludhiana to attend the marriage of the son of Mr Manjit
        Singh Calcutta, who had quit as minister in
        "protest" against use of "derogatory
        language"against Mr Gurcharan Singh and also there
        being no stopping by Mr Parkash Singh . Of late, Mr Gurcharan
        Singh has become " serious". Inside, his close
        friends say, as in case of every human being, there is an
        anxiety-neurosis because just when an important event
        (tercentenary celebrations of the birth of Khalsa are due
        in April 1999) is round the corner a "character
        assassination campaign" should not have been
        launched to dislodge him and defame him.
        His"tragedy" is he is too "involved and
        committed" to Sikhs and their cause: religious,
        political and economic. The "impulsive"
        reaction of Mr Parkash Singh is equally surprising. The Central leadership of
        the BJP in New Delhi is taking a wider view of the feud.
        It is keen on "amicable resolution" because any
        adverse fallout will affect BJP's own political
        calculations because the vast Sikh vote bank will get
        divided. Several contentious issues, like Udham Singh
        Nagar, are still pending, and some of its allies are
        uneasy. The unresolved conflict will mean harm to SAD
        itself as well. Neither Mr Gurcharan Singh
        nor Mr Parkash Singh is a "revolutionary"; both
        belong to typical, traditional Akali mould and culture.
        Therefore, the present developments and future
        possibilities will have to be seen in the larger
        perspective. The Jathedar of Akal Takht
        may not be aligned to Mr Gurcharan Singh he may also be
        against Mr Parkash Singh due to the presence of the
        Editor of a Jalandhar Punjabi daily in his camp. The
        Jathedar reportedly maintains in private that both
        feuding leaders have emerged after 40 years of
        "trial and tribulation". Their loss,
        individually or both, at this juncture will harm Panthic
        interests. Yet both leaders are fortifying their
        respective citadels. Thus the tormenting past,
        the stormy present and the uncertain future place the
        Akali politics in a whirlpool of intense speculation.
        Only one question begs an answer: What will be the final
        outcome ? 
 
 |