| No headway in
        Indo-Pak talks
 TNS and
        agencies
 NEW DELHI, Nov 13 
        The nine-day second phase of the composite Indo-Pakistan
        dialogue ended this afternoon with both sides failing to
        make any headway on issues relating to Siachen, the
        Tulbul navigation project, Sir Creek maritime boundary
        dispute and terrorism. However, the two sides
        struck a positive note on promotion of friendly exchanges
        in various fields. The two sides agreed to meet again by
        November 20 to finalise an agreement on the
        much-publicised Delhi-Lahore bus service. Pakistan squarely blamed
        India for talks failure and once again called for third
        party intervention to resolve bilateral differences. New
        Delhi, however, rejected the proposal. Speaking to mediapersons
        after the last item on the agenda of the dialogue,
        promotion of friendly and cultural exchanges, Pakistan
        Foreign Office spokesman Tariq Altaf said when the two
        sides could not resolve their problems bilaterally, the
        only way out was to have a third party to intervene or
        mediate. "We are prepared for
        any manner of such intervention, whether at the UN or
        International Court of Justice or any other international
        forum," he added. Even as Pakistani
        officials said they were "totally disappointed"
        with the outcome of the composite dialogue and accused
        India of adopting a "rigid and inflexible
        attitude" in resolving outstanding issues, India
        expressed satisfaction over the progress at the talks
        stating that "the process was continuing". Briefing mediapersons on
        todays talks, the Culture Secretary, Dr R.V.V.
        Aiyar said: "Pakistan informed us that it too had
        liberalised the visa regime to Indian nationals and would
        convey to us the details of the relaxation made in this
        regard." Dr Aiyar said both sides
        had agreed that visas for railways and airlines personnel
        would be granted in a specified timeframe not extending
        more than 30 days. "During our meeting
        today, we proposed detailed and practical suggestions in
        the field of art and culture, youth affairs, sports,
        information and media. The Pakistan side informed us that
        they would examine our proposals in the light of the
        India-Pakistan cultural agreement of 1988. We look
        forward to a positive and constructive response from
        them", Dr Aiyar said. On the issue of enhanced
        interaction in the field of media, Dr Aiyar said India
        had proposed a greater flow of newspapers and periodicals
        between the two countries. "We also proposed
        that both countries facilitate visits of journalists and
        agree to the posting of more newspapers and news agency
        correspondents on a reciprocal basis". "We also dwelt on the
        bilateral protocol of 1974 on the visits to religious
        shrines and conveyed the demand of many that the number
        of shrines located in Pakistan to which visits are
        permitted be increased and the number of pilgrims allowed
        on every visit increased." "We urged Pakistan to
        consider these proposals. It is most important that
        during such visits sanctity is maintained so that the
        sentiments of the pilgrims are not hurt. It is
        unfortunate that during the course of the visits of
        Indian pilgrims to Pakistan they have been subjected to
        hostile anti-India propaganda which takes place within
        the premises of gurdwaras. We asked Pakistan to take
        necessary steps to ensure that these activities are not
        permitted under any circumstances", Dr Aiyar said. The two sides also
        discussed the issue of civilian prisoners in the two
        countries and fishermen who trespass innocently in each
        others territory. "In this context, we
        emphasised that necessary steps should be taken to avoid
        delays and to work out a mechanism to ensure expeditious
        release and repatriation of innocent fishermen", he
        said. "With respect to
        civilian prisoners, both sides noted that since 1991
        there had been no exchange between the two countries. We
        informed Pakistan that our judicial systems require that
        any person who has completed his jail term should be
        released and if he is a foreigner he should be
        repatriated to his country. "We have since early
        this year conveyed to Pakistan on a case-by-case basis
        through diplomatic channels details of 67 Pakistani
        civilians ready for repatriation. Twentyone of them have
        already returned home and repatriation of the remaining
        Pakistani civilians prisoner is at various stages.
        "Once formalities are completed they would be
        repatriated to Pakistan. We proposed that civilian
        prisoners be repatriated on completion of sentence once
        travel documents are made available. Both sides agreed
        that there could be a meeting of officials concerned to
        ensure that this is done", Dr Aiyar said. Earlier, a spokesman of
        the Pakistan Foreign Ministry said: "We had come
        with high hopes for moving forward on resolution of
        bilateral disputes, met with total disappointment as
        there was no progress because of inflexibility and rigid
        attitude of India." He, however, maintained
        that Pakistan was keen on resolution of bilateral issues
        and wanted to "turn a new leaf" as "we
        dont want to go to the next century with these
        issues". "How long should we
        remain locked in this lack of progress", he asked
        asserting that friendship could be established only after
        just settlement of outstanding issues. He said "once
        fundamental and core issues are resolved, everything
        would follow". 
 
 |