| Victims of hostile localsFrom
        Ravi S. Singh
 Tribune News Service
 SONEPAT, Nov 16 
        Residents of Nangla Behlolpur in Sonepat district are
        finding themselves aliens in their own homeland with the
        government and the locals refusing to accept them in
        their state. 
            
                | Formerly
                located in Baghpat tehsil of Meerut district of
                UP, Nangla Behlolpur became part of Haryana after
                the Yamuna changed its course. The village was
                formally merged with Haryana in September, 1983
                when the Haryana and Uttar Pradesh (Alteration of
                Boundaries) Act, 1979, became effective. 
 As the river kept changing its course the
                boundaries of the villages in the two states were
                affected.
 |  Residents of
                Nangla Beholpur village look at remains of their
                belongings, which were set on fire on October 20.
                Photo by T. C. Malhotra
 |  Earlier, the miseries of
        the victims of the river were compounded on account of
        difference of opinion between the Haryana and Uttar
        Pradesh Governments regarding their addresses. As per the Act a status
        quo has been granted to the location of the villages with
        regard to maps of the two states, notwithstanding the
        changes in their boundaries caused by the Yamuna. In
        effect, the concept of "Fluctuating Boundary"
        was replaced by "permanent boundary". The Act
        was passed on the basis of Dixit award. The award was
        based on the Survey of India 1974-75. Natures fury has
        left an estimated 1100 persons living in a cluster of 80
        makeshift huts homeless and life a daily struggle. The
        state government authorities and the locals are
        determined to drive them out. On October 20 when the
        villagers were forced to take shelter at safer places in
        the neighbouring villages after the floods struck their
        habitation, they were victims of twin tragedy. Not only
        was their daily routine affected by the floods on their
        return they found that their hutments had been set ablaze
        by hostile neighbours in Khurampur village. The district
        administration and the police have turned a deaf ear to
        their numerous complaints and no action has yet been
        taken against the culprits after the first information
        report was filed on the second day of the incident. Also,
        no officer of the administration has so for visited the
        site. The Deputy Commissioner,
        Sonepat, Mr P.K. Mahapatra, told TNS today that
        preventive arrests were made on the day of the incident.
        But he expressed ignorance of the situation after the FIR
        was lodged. He expressed concern that people took law in
        their hand. He further said that a police post had been
        set up at Khurampur. The status of the village with
        regard to the Haryana and Uttar Pradesh (Alteration of
        boundaries) Act was sub judice, he added. The SP, Sonepat, Mr K.
        Selvaraj, said the investigation was still on. A visit to
        Nangla Behlolpur revealed that residents had preserved
        the ashes and remains of their huts and belongings burnt
        in the "arson". The miscreants were accused to
        have razed all 80 hutments killing three cattle in the
        inferno. The eldest member of the village, Mr Baljit
        Singh Yadav, said as many as 12 armed persons from the
        neighbouring Khurampur swooped on the hutments in the
        evening after opening fire. Except him and two others,
        all had left with cattle to safer places as the Yamuna
        had flooded the area. An inquiry revealed that
        the residents preferred hutments as the government was
        yet to provided "bundh" on the boundaries of
        the village to save it from the floods caused by the
        river. In absence of a bundh even "pucca"
        houses would not be able to stand against possible
        floods. The residents alleged
        earlier too there had been acts of aggression from the
        residents of Khurampur. According to them, some residents
        of Khurampur set three huts on fire, in September, in
        collusion with the local police. They alleged that instead
        of taking action against the culprits the police was
        siding with them. They further alleged that the police
        did not record all aspects of the violent incident on
        October 20 with a view to weakening the FIR. According to them, even
        though the Chief Electoral Officer had directed the
        district administration to get the names of some persons
        of the village registered in the electoral roll of the
        village, they were being deprived of their fundamental
        right to vote. The residents of the
        village said the reason for the "indifferent"
        attitude of the district administration was the pressure
        from residents of Khurampur. According to them, residents
        of Khurampur had better connections with the bureaucracy
        and politicians of Haryana. Besides, there seems to
        economic angle to the situation. As per the revenue
        record, Nangla Behlolpur has 254 acres of land. It is
        alleged that before the village formally became part of
        Haryana, the residents of Khurampur would use the land.
        For that matter, they allegedly still use part of the
        land by force. Another resident alleged that some
        residents of Khurampur had procured an ex parte order
        from the court staying the amalgamation of Nangla
        Behlolpur with Haryana. The order was procured without
        making the residents of Nangla Behlolpur a party to the
        case. Following a petition from resident of the village
        against the ex parte order, the Punjab and Haryana High
        Court on July 14 directed the lower court to settle the
        case within one year. 
 
 |