| No stay on Jaya's trial: SC NEW DELHI, Nov 26 (PTI)
         The Supreme Court today cleared the decks for the
        commencement of the full-fledged trial of AIADMK supremo
        Jayalalitha, some of her erstwhile cabinet colleagues and
        senior bureaucrats in certain corruption cases by three
        Chennai special courts. A Division Bench
        comprising Mr Justice M K Mukherjee and Mr Justice S P
        Kurdukar outrightly refused to stay the trial while
        issuing notice to the Tamil Nadu Government and the Union
        Government to be served within six weeks. "We will not stay the
        proceedings before the special courts on any
        grounds," the Bench said, and added that "let
        it be understood that the interim stay (sought by Ms
        Jayalalitha and others) is refused." To further clarify any
        doubts in the minds of the presiding officers of the
        three special courts constituted especially to try 46
        corruption cases against Ms Jayalalitha and others, the
        Bench said. "It is reiterated that issuance of the
        notice will not amount to the stay of any of the
        proceedings before the special courts." The apex court, while
        hearing the petitions filed by Ms Jayalalitha and others
        challenging the constitution of the special courts, had
        on November 6 passed an interim order valid till November
        26 that the proceedings before the special courts would
        not go beyond the stage of framing of charges against the
        accused. Appearing for Ms
        Jayalalitha, senior advocate P P Rao contended that the
        Tamil Nadu Government had on April 16, 1997, constituted
        28 special courts to try cases under the Prevention of
        Corruption Act, including seven at Chennai. However, the government on
        the very next day came out with another notification
        constituting three more special courts to try cases
        against the former Chief Minister which amounted to
        "picking and choosing cases" to harass Ms
        Jayalalitha, he added. The court repeatedly asked
        Mr Rao as to how Ms Jayalalitha stood discriminated as
        the three special courts would hear the matter as per law
        in the absence of her apprehension that she might not get
        a fair trial from these three special courts. The Madras High Court on
        November 3 had dismissed the petition of Ms Jayalalitha
        challenging the constitutional validity of the state
        government notification setting up three additional
        courts to try cases against Ms Jayalalitha. Ms Jayalalitha faces six
        corruption cases of which the courts have framed charges
        in three. The anti-corruption courts set up under the
        Prevention of Corruption Act are trying 47 cases against
        Ms Jayalalitha, some of her erstwhile cabinet colleagues
        and IAS officers. Ms Jayalalitha in her SLP
        has said that the constitution of the three special
        courts to try cases against her vitiated the right to
        equality guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution
        and represented the vindictive attitude of the
        Karunanidhi Government against her.  All cases relate to
        various corrupt practices allegedly indulged in by her
        during her chief ministership between 1991-96. The Madras High Court had
        held that prima facie corruption charges existed against
        her and some of her former ministerial colleagues and
        asked them to face "criminal prosecution" while
        dismissing Ms Jayalalithas contention that this was
        an attempt by the Karunanidhi Government to
        "politically annihilate" her. Rather, it was an
        "attempt (by petitioners) to justify their past
        omissions and to wriggle out of the situation in which
        they have been placed," a Division Bench comprising
        Mr Justice M S Liberhan and Mr Justice E Padmanabhan had
        observed in their 678-page judgement. The judges said there was
        no mala fide intention on the part of the Tamil Nadu
        Government in appointing special judges. 
  
 
 |