| Boycott poll, lose symbol:
        Election Commission NEW DELHI, Sept 20 (PTI)
         In a major ruling, the Election Commission has
        held that boycott of elections by a political party could
        lead to its de-recognition and withdrawal of its reserved
        symbol. "The
        Commissions responsibility is to help in every
        possible manner those political organisations which
        strive to strengthen democracy, and it cannot have any
        sympathy for those organisation which boycott, or become
        party to calls of boycott of elections," Chief
        Election Commissioner M.S. Gill and Election Commissioner
        J.M. Lyngdoh said in an order. The Commission gave its
        ruling while withdrawing recognition to Nagaland
        Peoples Council (NPC) for boycotting the Lok Sabha
        and Assembly elections in Nagaland in February this year. The perusal of records of
        the Commission show that NPC, recognised as a state party
        in Nagaland and allotted the reserved symbol
        Cock, does not fulfil the conditions for
        recognition as laid down in the 1968 Symbols Order, it
        said. Rejecting the plea of NPCs counsel and party
        functionaries, who made their submissions on September 1,
        the Commission pointed out that the Shiromani Akali Dal
        (Badal) and the Shiromani Akali Dal (Simranjit Singh
        Mann), which had boycotted elections in 1992, were duly
        de-recognised by it under the Symbols Order after
        reviewing their poll performance.  Noting that it never gave
        any indication or encouragement to those trying for
        postponement of polls, the Commission said it was
        "not concerned with any other authority giving any
        assurance or indication about deferment of elections,
        which the Constitution did not permit". Mr Gill and Mr Lyngdoh
        said: "If the present party or any one else in the
        state of Nagaland had any grievance or apprehension about
        the conditions not being conducive to conducting free and
        fair elections in Nagaland, it could have approached the
        Commission for strengthening the law and order machinery
        by such re-inforcement as would have made the conditions
        conducive for free and fair elections...." "If a party chooses
        to boycott the elections and not to participate in the
        democratic process, the Commission cannot encourage any
        such move or course of action of that party," the
        ruling added. Any sympathetic
        consideration or concession shown towards such a party by
        the Commission would send "wrong signals" to
        the Indian polity and may frustrate the Commissions
        efforts to strengthen democracy and democratic
        institutions in the country, Mr Gill and Mr Lyngdoh held. NPC President Shurhozelia
        and other office-bearers and partys counsel Vijay
        Hansaria contended that "Naga Ho Ho", an apex
        body and a respectable non-government organisation in
        Nagaland, gave a call on December 18, last year to defer
        polls taking into consideration the activities of
        underground elements in the state.  While discussions were
        going on, notifications for holding the elections were
        issued by the Commission on January 28, he said, adding
        the party had no time to negotiate with the underground
        elements and also Naga Ho Ho and other NGOs to withdraw
        their call for poll boycott. The NPC and Mr Hansaria
        contended that it was a "sacrifice" made by the
        party in the interest of peace in the state and said the
        Commission should not withdraw the partys
        recognition as that would amount to "double
        punishment". Maintaining that the power
        of the Commission to de-recognise a recognised party had
        been upheld by the Supreme Court in a 1996 case. The
        Commission said if the polls were not conducted, it could
        have led to "breakdown" of the constitutional
        machinery in the state. In its order, the Commission
        said: "If any political party or organisation
        boycotts elections, it has to suffer the consequences
        which legally flow."Such political party cannot
        validly complain before the Commission that its poll
        performance should not be considered, for purposes of its
        recognition, or continued recognition, under the Symbols
        Order, at an election which it by its own volition
        boycotted," it said .It also gave the example
        of J and K Peoples Conference losing its
        recognition because it did not participate in the 1996
        elections in the border state.Noting that in rare
        instances parties actually carried out the threat of
        boycotting the electoral process, the Commission said
        "political parties, particularly, recognised
        parties, should always act so as to carry forward the
        democratic process rather than negate the same". Asserting that it had
        consistently and firmly tried to curb the tendency of
        poll boycott, it said "the major problems in the
        political domain in the country have to be resolved in
        the political arena itself. It has to be resolved
        democratically through the electoral process".With
        this ruling, the NPC has become a registered unrecognised
        party till its performance is again reviewed by the
        Commission at the next general election as and when held.
  
 
 |