MDU caught on the wrong
foot
From
Jatinder Sharma
Tribune News Service
ROHTAK, April 3
Maharshi Dayanand University has been caught on the
wrong foot over the election of Dr S.B. Siwaich as a
member of the Medical Council of India.
Dr Siwaich, Head,
Department of Medicines and Dean, Academic Affairs, at
the Pandit B.D. Sharma post-graduate Institute of Medical
Sciences (PGIMS), was elected member of the Medical
Council in place of Dr D.S. Dubey by the university court
on March 31.
The term of Dr Dubey has
expired on August 16, 1998, and the Medical Council had
told the university to initiate steps for holding the
election to fill the vacancy on July 17, 1998. But the
Vice-Chancellor reportedly decided to elect the member at
a meeting of the university court.
Under Statute 18(D) of the
university calendar, the medical faculty of the
university comprise 53 members of whom four are experts
from outside, Readers and Lecturers (four each) and 41
Professors, including the Director of the PGIMS.
Section 3(1) (B) of the
Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, says every university
which has a medical college attached to it will elect one
member from among the members of the medical faculty.
As per the normal practice
followed by this university since its inception, the name
of the Director of the PGIMS was always recommended for
nomination as member of the Medical Council. But this
time the tradition has been broken.
At least 37 members of the
medical faculty have in separate and joint
representations to the Vice-Chancellor alleged that the
election was held without providing an opportunity to
other members of the faculty and without following the
proper procedure.
Interestingly, the
university has not finalised any election rules in this
regard. The draft election rules provided by the Medical
Council are yet to be approved by the Executive Council
of the university.
The meeting of the
university court was scheduled on March 31 and until the
evening of March 30, the university had not received any
nomination paper. The nomination papers of Dr Siwaich
were filed just an hour before the start of the meeting
on March 31.
The nomination papers of
Dr Siwaich, therefore, caught the university authorities
unaware as it was not prepared to hold the election. Dr
Dubey came to the "rescue" of the
Vice-Chancellor when he announced he would not contest
the election.
The "gesture"
shown by Dr Dubey has failed to satisfy other members of
the medical faculty. They say the election of Dr Siwaich
is legally void and has no sanctity as the election
notice was not circulated among the members.
The members of the medical
faculty have urged the Vice-Chancellor to hold the
election afresh after following due procedure to avoid
any legal battle.
The election has gained
significance because of the ongoing tussle between the
university and the Medical Council over the migration of
students to the local Government College. The Medical
Council, it is learnt, has not approved the migrations
made by the university in 1998.

|