BJP to work for consensus
on contentious issues
Tribune
News Service
New Delhi, Aug 26
The BJP today stated that it would try to evolve a
consensus among its allies on contentious issues like
Ayodhya, Article 370 and the common civil code.
"We are first bound
by what has been agreed with our allies in the NDA.
However, we would try to evolve a consensus on these
contentious issues and would solve them amicably like the
Cauvery issue," the BJP spokesperson, Mr Venkaiah
Naidu, told newspersons here today.
Reiterating that these
issues were not on the agenda of the BJP as these were
not part of the manifesto, Mr Naidu said "we would
not force our views on the allies and we are committed to
implementing what has been agreed upon with them."
Mr Naidu said, the BJP
even if it secured a majority on its own, would form the
government along with the allies and would abide by the
NDA manifesto.
Criticising the
stability plank of the Congress, he said "how can
they point a finger at us when they are themselves
forging alliances or having seat adjustment with other
parties."
"If coalition
parties cannot give a stable government, then by the same
logic the Congress with its poll alliances and seat
adjustment cannot give a stable government," Mr
Naidu stated.
He also announced that
the BJP and the Biju Janata Dal (BJD) had reached an
agreement on seat sharing in Orissa. While the BJP would
contest on nine seats, the BJD would contest on 12 seats,
the same number it contested in the last general
elections.
While welcoming the role
of the Election Commission (EC) in unearthing 1387
duplicate ballot boxes from seven districts in Bihar, the
BJP urged the EC to take the nation into its confidence
over measures it was taking to ensure a free and fair
poll.
"It is not clear
whether the thorough checking in other districts was on
or was in the process. We request the EC to make a
categorical statement on the disturbing news coming from
Bihar," Mr Naidu said, adding that "in the
absence of any statement from the EC, the electorate
would not be sure whether there were duplicate boxes in
other districts also."

|