CTBT: team on way to USA
From
Shubhabrata Bhattacharya
Tribune News Service
NEW DELHI, Dec 19
Two Joint Secretaries of the Ministry of External
Affairs, Mr Alok Prasad, who looks after the
Americas desk and Mr Rakesh Sood (Disarmament and
Strategic Issues Division) are on their way to
Washington, to meet their counterparts, Mr Bob Einhorn,
Assistant Secretary of State for non-Proliferation and Mr
Mathew Daley, Adviser (South Asia).
The two-day talks, on
Tuesday and Wednesday, will set the agenda for the 10th
round of talks, in London next month, between External
Affairs Minister, Jaswant Singh and U.S. Deputy Secretary
of State, Stroke Talbott. These talks, which may perhaps
be the last between the two sides prior to the US
President, Mr Bill Clintons proposed visit to India
in March, 2000, are considered crucial.
According to available
indications, President Clinton is likely to snub
Islamabads military junta by omitting Pakistan from
his itinerary. Hence efforts are on from the Indian side
to make the best of this visit - signing of the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) may be one such
step. The talks in Washington this week and the London
meeting in January thus assume significance.
Prime Minister, Atal
Behari Vajpayee met a delegation led by Congress
President Mrs Sonia Gandhi on Friday in a bid to evolve a
consensus on the CTBT issue. As reported by The Tribune
earlier, the Congress delegation preferred to listen
rather than talk. They wanted to be informed about the
details of Jaswant-Talbott talks held so far. The PM is
meeting Left parties on Monday.
Significantly after
Fridays meeting the task of briefing the media on
behalf of both sides was left to Mr Jaswant Singh, who
indicated that the Congress leaders were likely to
consult each other and if necessary, seek another
meeting. The underlying spirit of Mr Jaswant Singhs
briefing reflected the evolution of a consensus -though
it has not been spelt out that way so far.
The Congress Deputy
leader in Lok Sabha, Mr Madhavrao Scindia told the media
on Saturday that his party had not formulated its stand
yet. True. However, from available indications, the
Congress is not averse to India signing the CTBT, only it
would not like the role of Congress Prime Ministers in
evolving Indias nuclear policy to be pushed under
the carpet. Nor would the Congress like the impression to
go round that the decision on CTBT was taken under
pressure from Washington.
Thus, Washington has to
take some more steps apart from the one taken on last
Friday morning of removing Indias strategic
and scientific establishments from a dual use
blacklist for dealings with American establishments and
firms.
The effect of U.S.
arm-twisting in the post Pokhran-II era, in the form of
sanctions and world Bank related restrictions have
been negligible so far, but it may start hurting in the
coming months. Hence while India is trying to evolve a
consensus at home, Washington too has to play a positive
role.
With the American Senate
having refused to ratify the CTBT, India can now work out
its timeframe for a three-stage approach:-
- Signing of the CTBT
by India (This could precede President
Clintons March visit, if Washington plays
ball;
- Unilke in the USA,
the Government of the day is empowered to sign
any international treaty or covenant and thus
does not need a parliamentary approval. (the bid
to evolve a national consensus has begun, from
available indications, in the right earnest); and
- Depositing the
Instrument of Ratification (This is the most
important Stage merely signing the CTBT is
not enough).
From available
indications, New Delhi no longer considers the CTBT as
discriminatory.

|