![]() |
N E W S I N ..D E T A I L |
Monday, January 18, 1999 |
| weather n
spotlight today's calendar |
Appeal to withdraw edict CHANDIGARH, Jan 17 It is indeed unprecedented in the history of the Sikh gurdwara management body that came into existence in 1925 that 131 SGPC members have requested the Akal Takht Jathedar in writing to withdraw an edict. There are 175 elected members. The SGPC has the right to appoint or remove an Akal Takht Jathedar. These 131 signatories to the appeal today echoed what was said by 10 of the 15 members of the SGPC Executive. They wanted Bhai Ranjit Singh, Akal Takht chief, to withdraw the hukamnama ordering the warring Akali factions to truce till the tercentenary celebrations of the Khalsa have started by mid-April. The fight between the Chief Minister and the Akali Dal president, Mr Parkash Singh Badal, and his arch rival the SGPC chief, Mr Gurcharan Singh Tohra, has been on and in fact, has entered a decisive stage. The Badal camp is keen to oust Mr Tohra at the earliest. As per the edict no action, in other words, notice to summon the SGPC general house to pass a no-confidence motion against Mr Tohra could be taken up till April 15. Since the SGPC will be meeting in March for its budget session and action against Mr Tohra can be initiated, hence the urgency to withdraw the 'humkamnama'. Today, the members, who have launched a signature campaign for the review of the 'hukamnama' issued on December 31 last said in the appeal that the edict should be withdrawn in the interest of the Sikh Panth and Punjab at large. SGPC General Secretary Balbir Singh Pannu gave details to newspersons. Asked if any action would be taken against the Jathedar if he did not withdraw the 'hukamnama', he said, "I am not competent enough to comment on this. However, the SGPC is empowered to consider the "hukamnama" as it comes under the purview of the 1925 Sikh Gurdwara Act and Akal Takht is also recognised by the Act." He claimed that the SGPC had invoked this Act to dismiss Jathedars earlier also. Mr Pannu denied that the appeal to withdraw the 'hukamnama' was violative of the Sikh 'maryada', saying "earlier also hukamnamas have been withdrawn". He said the members had sought withdrawal of the 'hukamnama' "as it does not send proper signals and while issuing the edict other Jathedars were not consulted". Mr Pannu extended a veiled threat to Bhai Ranjit Singh saying that by in- voking the Sikh Gurdwara Act of 1925, the SGPC General House had earlier sacked some of the jathedars of Akal Takht. Justifying the appeal to withdraw the 'hukamnama', Mr Pannu claimed it had sent wrong signals about the Panth and the Akali Dal on the eve of the tercentenary celebrations of the Khalsa Panth. "Once the controversial 'hukamnama' was withdrawn, mischievous elements within the Panth who were trying to create a division could be easily handled by the Sikh leadership," he added. Mr Pannu reiterated the demand for convening a meeting of the SGPC executive or the general house at the earliest as demanded by the 10 members of the Executive. He also repeated the demand for the removal of Mr Manjit Singh Calcutta from the office of Senior General Secretary of the SGPC since his appointment was unconstitutional and he had openly criticised the existence of the Damdama Sahib Takht. It is clear to Mr Tohra that he is in a hopeless minority and his days are numbered. But his trump card, the edict, is there. Once Mr Badal violates the edict, Mr Tohra could go to Akal Takht and plead that he be summoned and declared a tankhaia. This could upset Mr Badal's whole game. While Mr Badal is commanding massive support of the MLAs, MPs, district Jathedars and SGPC members he is playing soft. Interestingly, both
leaders are scrupulously avoiding attacking each other. |
| | Nation
| Punjab | Haryana | Himachal Pradesh | Jammu & Kashmir | Chandigarh | | Editorial | Business | Sports | | Mailbag | Spotlight | World | 50 years of Independence | Weather | | Search | Subscribe | Archive | Suggestion | Home | E-mail | |