![]() |
| Tuesday,
October 16, 2001, Chandigarh, India
|
|
||||
|
PAU students hold rally Ludhiana, October 15 The rally, flagged off by Dr K.S. Verma, Programme coordinator on behalf of the Director Students’ Welfare, PAU, passed through the PAU campus, localities of Maharaj Nagar, Krishna Nagar, Maya Nagar, Shahid Udham Singh Nagar, Kitchlu Nagar, Haibowal Khurd and Rishi Nagar. Led by the programme officers Dr H.S. Jassal, Dr R.K. Kalra and Mr S.S. Sooch, volunteers carried placards and banners and shouted slogans to spread the message in the community, especially the youth. According to Dr K.S. Verma, Programme Coordinator, PAU the rally was a part of the nationwide programme of the National Service Scheme organisation under the theme “Youth for healthy society” and such rallies would be held in the adopted villages Pamal and Pamali adopted by the NSS organisation of the PAU. Earlier the NSS volunteers carried out mass eradication cum uprooting of Parthenium (Congress grass) from the experimental area as well as residential areas of the university wherein the volunteer made use of the polythene bags as gloves for uprooting these most poisonous weed plants. |
PSEB told to refund
payment Ludhiana, October 15 Mr Amanpreet Singh received a PSEB memo, where the board had demanded Rs 84,567 from him. According to the memo, the consumer had been charged with a theft of energy as the seals of his power-consumption meter had been found to be tampered with and there had been a 76.84 per cent reduction in the meter speed. The complainant had told the forum that the charge was baseless. The consumer had demanded full details of the offence, but the PSEB officials failed to supply these. They told him that his meter was running slow and his account had been overhauled. The consumer was allegedly forced to deposit the amount in instalments. His power-supply connection was disconnected and restored only after he deposited Rs 3,383, first instalment of the fine, on December 20, 2000. He protested before paying every instalment. Mr Amanpreet said the demand had been illegal as it had not been raised according to rules of the PSEB. He said he had not been issued a notice to be present at the time of checking, though such a notice was mandatory. The consumer also alleged that the checking had been false. The PSEB’s plea was that the meter had been checked in a door-to-door drive, where the seals of the consumer’s meter had been found to be tampered with. When the meter was checked at site with standard heater-load-and-stop-watch method, it was recording a low consumption of energy by 75 per cent. After this, the meter was properly packed and sealed and sent to the ME Laboratory for computerised checking. The laboratory report supported the earlier claim and added that the current coil of the meter had been cut. The respondent said it was a case of measured theft. The forum said, according to the documents produced, there appeared to be no evidence that the meter had been packed and sealed properly. “Moreover, the consumer was not asked to be present at the time of the checking. The laboratory report does not bear the signature of the consumer or his representative, which is mandatory,” the forum said. |
| | Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 121 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |