|
|
Emily Dickinson perhaps had the
same thought in mind when she murmured: "Because I could
not stop for Death/He kindly stopped for me;/The carriage held
but just ourselves/And immortality."
Easwaran
confides that when a close relative or a dear friend died,
"I could almost feel death’s hot breath upon my
collar". Death, he says, is walking close beside us. The
whole universe is a theatre of death. Everything that is
created is in the process of passing away. The monsoon moth
lives for but a few hours, but even the Ganga and the
Himalayas and the mother earth, which in our common parlance
are deemed eternal entities, are going through their cycle of
life and death. The sun, to all appearance eternal, with six
billion years behind it, has already entered middle age.
Time consumes
all. Even the universe, with its millions of galaxies, may
have had a beginning and come to an end; although our Hindu
scriptures hold that in the endless cycle of creation,
expansion and destruction, there have been countless universes
like ours and there will be countless more hereafter. As
Krishna says in the Gita: "I am time, the destroyer of
all;/I have come to consume the world."
The author
believes that over all this transience reigns an immutable
power that governs all the natural forces of the cosmos. He
takes this belief from the Upanishads which proclaim: "As
the command of that power fire burns, the sun shines, stars
glow, the wind blows, and death stalks about to kill." He
also believes that the core of our personality is divine, and
that the purpose of life is to discover this divinity for
ourselves. "The Lord is not a figure in the distant
galaxy, but a divine presence that abides in our hearts as our
real self."
Recalling
Meister Eckhart’s dictum that "thirty or forty skins or
hides, as thick and hard as an ox’s or a bear’s, cover the
soul", Easwaran says that Hindu scriptures use a similar
image simplified into what are called the "five
sheaths" or jackets of self. He says these jackets are
(1) the body or "the jacket made of food", (2) vital
energy, or "the jacket made of prana", (3) "the
jacket made of mind", (4) "the jacket made of the
intellect" and, finally, (5) "the garment of the
ego". It is these five sheaths that have to be shed or
taken off one after another, if we are to realise what we
really are. It is not easy. We are not only dressed in them,
we are indeed trapped in them. The world is too much with us,
as Wordsworth testified.
Even
conceptualisation presents problems, as Easwaran illustrates.
"In my talks when I say ‘You are not the body’ I
usually get appreciative nods. But when I say, ‘You are not
the mind either’, people protest and say: ‘Now wait a
minute!’ It is through the practice of meditation that we
can best get to know the world of the mind and transcend
it." He elaborates the ideas propounded in the Gita and
brings his own conviction and faith to bear on their
interpretation. The central theme of his thesis is that our
body is part of the phenomenal world, limited in time as it is
in space. As long as we identify with the body, we are subject
to these same limitations.
If we start
thinking of ourselves as the self, we learn to detach
ourselves from the fruits of action, remain untouched by the
hurly-burly of life, take on the garb of an observer, and then
death would no more be a rupture in our consciousness than is
taking off a coat. As Krishna says, "The deluded do not
see the self when it leaves the body or when it dwells within
it. They do not see the self enjoying the world or acting in
it. But those who have eyes of wisdom see." It is
essential to step out of the constricting hold of the mind, as
also to take off the intellectual sheaf in order to "leap
beyond the duality of subject and object." But the
hardest to cast off is the demon of the ego. "Only the
miracle of divine grace can help us get rid of it,"
Easwaran says, and quotes Katha Upanishad: "The supreme
self cannot be known through study of scriptures,/Nor through
the intellect, nor through hearing discourses about it/It can
be known only by those whom the self chooses/Verily unto them
does the self reveal itself."
These ideas
are not new for us in India. But Easwaran has mainly the
western readers in mind. Like great teachers of yore, he talks
in a simple, straightforward language. He relates this ancient
wisdom in stories from everyday life. It is verily gagar mein
sagar (an ocean contained in a pitcher), as we say in Hindi.
Which would make even an Indian prize and possess this little
book.
In
particular, I was charmed by the way he explains the nature of
desire: "Most of our desires have nothing to do with our
approval. They crowd into the mind about half a dozen at a
time, each hanging on to the coattails of the next. In the
movie theatre of the mind, desires do not have to queue up or
buy a ticket. They barge in and sit wherever they like...
Whichever is the biggest gets the best seat. A fat, selfish
desire can occupy a whole box; a little desire has to sit on
the floor in the back. Good thoughts often get only a corner
to stand up in. Anger claims a family pew; sex often gets the
whole central section. And what remains is taken up by all the
poorer relatives, resentment, hostility, jealousy and the
like. Sympathy, forgiveness, understanding and their friends
are crowded together in a corner where umbrellas are
kept."
He prescribes
that one generate the force of meditation to bring order in
the theatre of one’s mind.
He briefly
mentions the Buddha’s theory of the momentariness of time to
explain how the mind generally works and creates unnecessary
tensions. The Buddha had illustrated the illusion of time with
the example of a stick with its ends on fire. When this stick
is swiftly rotated in dark it looks like a circle of fire. As
long as it is swirling swiftly, the Buddha said, you see a
circle. When the whirling stops, the circle disappears. It is
because the mind is being swirled around faster and faster, we
see things that are not there. In an agitated mind, imaginary
hopes and fears take on the garb of reality. If the Buddha had
been around today, he would have given the simile of the movie
film, where "stills", when run through a projector,
provide the illusion of motion and action.
He also
touches upon the Buddha’s eight-fold path of right
understanding and aspiration, right speech and conduct, right
occupation and effort, right mindfulness and meditation to
attain enlightenment. Easwaran believes, like the Buddha, that
one’s next life is entirely dependent on one’s karma in
this life.
Thus the road
to immortality is paved with a belief in the existence of an
indestructible atma that resides in oneself, and in
reincarnation. And there is the rub. Clearly, enlightenment or
immortality is denied to those who only believe in the
universe, as it is, not in any immutable power behind it or
controlling it. Some, like Khushwant Singh, believe that death
is a kind of full stop, "earth to earth, ashes to ashes,
dust to dust". Undoubtedly, there has been some evidence
of reincarnation, and some people have been experiences in
seances, yet very few among non-Hindus believe in the theory
of reincarnation. Christians and Muslims, who form the biggest
religions in the world, in fact believe in the Day of
Judgment, and bury their dead, so that they may arise at that
time. All religions, though, believe in the concept of heaven
and hell.
Ironically,
with the spread of "enlightenment", all these old
religious notions are fast losing their grip on people’s
minds. Public and personal morality, which earlier received
sanction from religion, is emanating more and more from
secular ethics or rationality. Repression of sexuality
resulting from religious canons of disciplining the senses, or
the puritanical attitude of frowning upon all pleasures, have
led to abnormal behaviour, causing more harm than good.
I tend to
feel that man’s mind has been enslaved by religions. As Karl
Marx summed up, religion is the opiate of the masses. People
have been so effectively drugged they do not even know it.
Enlightenment requires a sustained de-addiction programme. As
it is, it is not easy to discern the face of truth. What with
different sets of "revealed knowledge" being
available to choose from, there is no incentive to independent
thinking. Rather one runs a serious risk of earning the
opprobrium of being a heretic. But it appears that a
prerequisite of an enquiry into the nature of truth is to
disabuse our mind of the a priori wisdom of the Gita and the
Upanishads and the Vedas, the Bible and the Koran and so on.
I am not for
a moment suggesting that we disregard or discard them. They
are manna from the heaven for the believers and the most
wonderful heritage of mankind. Just put it aside if you can,
and then scan the face of truth. What you see perhaps is
somewhat like what Einstein saw, or what Stephen Hawking or
his ilk see: the limitless expanse of the universe waltzing to
a tune only partly understood. What we do understand is that
the tune is inherent in it. No one is playing it from outside.
Our truth had better be in tune with this.
There is no
room here for God or heaven or hell, or an indestructible
soul. These were useful lullabies for mankind’s childhood,
which have acted as sedatives, and have outlived their utility
at least for some of us. Do we dare wake up, now that we are
attaining adulthood? Is the deliverance from death attained
through non-indulgence of the senses and "stilling"
the mind, removing the "jackets", and withdrawing
into an enchanting world of meditation, a way of awakening or
going into a self induced hibernation?
I am transgressing.I suppose
one is not supposed to talk back to a guru in our old
tradition. But Eknath Easwaran is a guru of the West, where
free feedback from pupils is prized. Penguin Books have done a
good job in bringing out this handy, inexpensive and pithy
book, which is bound to be a popular read.
|