|
Uttarakhand is "a region with
an area of about 41,000 sq km, a population of six million,
along with a distinct geographical location, history, culture
and social anthropology and an area which has seen great neglect
because of its being a part of a big state and wrong policies
emerges as a viable unit as a state".
The book
vividly shows details of a region embedded in the Himalayan
range and how successive governments’ policies and system
aberrations had led to its neglect and backwardness, making
survival itself a nightmare, forcing youth to migrate in search
of menial and clerical jobs for sustenance.
Uttarakhand has
distinct zones: the foothills, including Terai, Bhhabar and the
Shivalks; the lesser Himalayas; the great Himalayas; and the
Trans-Himalayan zone; and five river systems—the Yamuna, the
Ganges, Nayar, West Ganga and the Kalli that marks the boundary
with Nepal. The inspiration for a book came at a women’s
conference at Panjab University, where the author is a Reader in
History. She had come across women delegates from Uttarakhand,
for whom communication was a stumbling block and language a
barrier. They had a lot to say but could not. The Indian Council
of Historical Research provided a ‘travel-cum-research grant’.
The author
meticulously packs in a lot of information, facts and
statistics. Though based on research, the narrative is neither
pure academic nor follows the beaten text-book path. It is a
story-book replete with references, an anthology of folk songs
and poetry penned by the people in the course of their movement.
The book
recapitulates the "excesses" committed by successive
governments to suppress the movement and the resistance put up
by the people, who ensured their struggle remained peaceful and
non-violent. It gives a chronology of the events and
developments beginning 1926 and weaves in peoples’ sighs,
smiles, sacrifices and sufferings showing how they did not give
up, despite their poor economy. They selflessly and sincerely
pursued their objective without a desire for any individual
rewards. Whatever any political party may say and claim, the
book contends that political parties often acted as spoilsports,
changing their tacks and stance or doing a volte face on the
demand for creation of Uttarakhand. They did not flow with the
people’ sentiments and aspirations.
The book also
mentions the role of the Akalis and their ranting following
submission of a report on the inclusion of Udhamsingh Nagar into
Uttarakhand by George Fernandes in the Parliament.
The book was still in the press
when the Bill was passed by the Parliament and Uttarakhand
became a reality. The Conclusion updates this development but
this was left out from the "sequence of important
events". The book is an unfinished portrait of a state. But
all credit to the people, who have shown where from democracy
draws its power.
|