|
Spreading the message of love & justice
I fully
endorse the views of Justice Rajinder Sachar in his article “Abolish
death penalty” (July 5). Leo Tolstoy, the great Russian writer, has
observed in his novel “Resurrection”: “For many centuries,
people considered to be criminals have been executed. Well, have they
been exterminated?” The award of death penalty for murder is, in
fact, based on the pre-historic and pagan concept of justice. No one
commits murder just for the heck of it. The consequences are quite
known to everyone. Many a time, the murderer is himself at the
receiving end till he is forced to commit the crime. The number of
murders and convictions depend upon the temperament of people of a
particular region and production of witnesses in court by the
prosecution, respectively. General conclusions cannot be drawn. The
need of the hour is to spread the message of mutual love and justice
among the younger generation to eliminate the negative thoughts of
hatred, greed and revenge. A few decades back, in Punjab, a murderer
was acquitted by the court but the brothers of the victim, shot him
dead on his coming out of the court room, yelling: “The Judge may
acquit you, but we won’t”. S.S. BENIWAL, Chandigarh |
|
II
Justice
Rajinder Sachar is absolutely right in saying that “sometimes it is
miscarriage of justice”. When the victim cannot be compensated after
death what a man cannot give, what right he has to take? Death
sentence is regarded as the most deterrent punishment to set right an
extreme wrong as well as to deter future wrong-doers. However, most
surveys released the world over contradict it. No doubt, more than
118 countries have abolished death penalty either in law or practice.
Hence, life sentence is better than death penalty. The quality of
legal advice, based on money power, enables the rich to avoid death
penalty, making a mockery of justice to all. PRAN SALHOTRA,
Gurdaspur
Governors’ removal
Apropos of the editorial “Why this
fuss?” (July 3), in a democracy, we agree to disagree. Here the
Opposition has a role and the Government, a responsibility. The
unceremonial removal of governors on ideological basis is not a very
convincing argument. After all almost every public servant has
political leanings. This being his personal privilege should in no way
interfere with the discharge of his duties as per the policies and
programmes of the government of the day. If one is found wanting,
there are legal and constitutional provisions to set things right.
Those in power should set a healthy convention in the larger interest
of the nation. The Opposition shall certainly reciprocate. S. SWAROOP
SHARMA,
II
A hue and cry is being raised on the
removal of those Governors who were appointed by the NDA government.
In fact, these Governors should have resigned the moment the UPA
Government took office. KHUSHHAL THAKUR,
Of human
rights
Reference “Liberal Congress traditions at stake” by Kuldip
Nayar (July 8). It is fortunate that Indians are not taken in by the
“Rightists”. The very idea of “human rights” in India is
conceived in the sin of attempts to patronise anti-national elements
and Pakistan’s moles and to indulge in legal quibbling to extricate
them from the clutches of the law-enforcing agencies. The ploy of the
“human rights activists” to communalise everything is too blatant
and brazen as not to be perceived by even an ordinary person. “Human
rights” movement is a political cabal pandering to a worst type of
policy. It is because of this that people never believe their version
of a happening. What is wrong if the terrorists are hanged by a nearby
pole? After all justice by deterrent punishment is more important than
merely the niceties of law. The decision to do away with POTA has, no
doubt, sent a wave of jubilation among human rights activists but the
law-abiding citizens, who value human life, are shocked by the
anti-national and short-sighted policy of Dr Manmohan Singh’s
government. Police reforms are long overdue. Not to save the
terrorists but to help common man get justice. Everybody is equal
before law. Special privileges cannot be granted to terrorists. If the
letter of the law has to be a little distorted for the sake of justice
and the good of society, it is no violation of human rights. CHAMAN
LAL KORPAL,
|
| HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Mailbag | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |