Bridge

WEST committed a faux pas on this deal from rubber bridge. Would you have fallen into the same trap/He led the three of spade of East king, which was allowed to win. When the four of spades was returned, declarer won with the ace and West followed with the eight, mentally recording that his queen and jack were now good. Declare had little option but to play on diamonds and East won with the ace. Much good did it do him! When he returned a spade West claimed two tricks in the suit and East’s remaining spade withered on the vine. The no trump game was made. West should have unblocked the spade queen on the second round, retaining J-8. When East gained the lead in diamonds and returned a third round of spades. West could win the jack and returned the eight for East to overtake with the nine. The defenders would then score the five tricks that were their due. On this particular deal there was no excuse for West’s carelessness. South Stayman response had denied four spades so there could be no possible need to retain both the queen and the jack of the suit.

Correctly you pass on the first round. What would you say no, when partner re-opens with a take out double?

Answer

You should not consider passing for penalties, with only four trumps. Nor should you bid higher than the minimum level, since partner is a passed hand. The choice is between IH and INT. I slightly prefer INT, since partner does not guarantee four hearts and INT is almost certain to be a sensible contract.

Awards: INT-10, IH-8, 2H-6, 2NT-4, Pass-3.

David Bird — Knight Features





HOME