n
          India, millions of poor children access education only through
          government schools. But these schools are often neither engaging nor
          innovative. Is it possible to change the rot in government schools? Is
          it really possible to convert the stuffy classrooms into spaces where
          children really learn with joy? Cynics would contest this, knowing
          the poor quality of education in most government schools. But a recent
          book, Improving Government Schools: What has been tried and what
          works — edited by Mandira Kumar and Padma M Sarangapani —
          tempts us to believe that a long-lasting change in the system is
          possible. 
The book is the result of a documentation project done by
          Sutradhar, a Bangalore-based educational centre. Sutradhar undertook
          the project to document various ‘intrusions’ in government
          schools. The 23 initiatives presented in the book go beyond the
          individuals and organisations to understand the design of the
          interventions themselves, and the processes — both within the
          organisation and on the field. 
Take PRISM (Project in Science and
          Maths), which aimed to energise government schools in Maharashtra, a
          joint effort of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and the Homi
          Bhabha Centre for Science Education. The project focused on
          strengthening the teachers’ abilities to teach subjects like science
          and mathematics. For example, while teaching a lesson on ‘Tame and
          Wild Animals’, teachers normally put usefulness of domestic animals
          against the fierceness of wild animals. But PRISM encouraged teachers
          to start a debate in the class by posing the question: ‘Can tigress’
          milk be used by humans?’ It generated lively discussions. Children
          had to put in a lot of effort and think about what taming an animal
          involves. 
Another NGO, Suvidya from Bangalore, developed a maths lab
          of 100 items — about 65 materials and 35 charts — to make
          mathematics interesting and enjoyable. (Some of the lab material was
          made with old greeting cards. The folk game chowkabhara was
          adapted for mathematical problems.) The lab encouraged children to
          take initiative, ask questions, and even feel free to correct the
          teacher. 
The School Health Education Programme in Thane district,
          Maharashtra, initiated by the Foundation for Research in Community
          Health, used children’s own bodies as teaching aids. For example,
          the heart was drawn on the body of a child indicating the exact
          location and size. Children heard their own heart beat, felt their
          pulse, used a magnifying glass to observe teeth, hands, skin and
          flies, and used a thermometer to measure body temperature. 
The
          Centre for Learning Resources — again in Maharashtra — devised a
          novel project of interactive radio. The distance teacher does the bulk
          of the teaching, directs activities such as exercises and songs, and
          answers questions that are raised within the lesson. There are time
          slots during the broadcast for children to respond to questions, or
          dialogue with each other. The class teacher facilitates this process
          and adds to it after the lesson is over. It thus turns the
          traditionally one-way technology of radio, into a two-way one. This
          technology helped rural children cope with their fear of learning and
          speaking English. 
Interestingly, many of the initiatives are
          confined to a few states — Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Delhi and
          Karnataka. The editors were surprised not to find any remarkable
          experiments in states like West Bengal, Orissa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu
          — where NGOs have a strong presence. 
In 1986, NGO Eklavya in
          Madhya Pradesh began the groundbreaking task of making the school
          social science curriculum more meaningful and interesting for
          children, and to help learners face reality. The Prathmik Shiksha
          Karyakram, known as Prashika, grew from an experiment conducted by
          Eklavya. It developed the Khushi-Khushi (happiness) series of
          textbooks for Classes I to V in regular Hindi language. The local
          history, geography and culture form an integral part of the content.
          These textbooks have an abundance of illustrations, games, riddles,
          poems and puzzles that invite children to learn. 
The Concerned for
          Working Children, an NGO based in Karnataka, has been one of the first
          in the country to look at the complexities and interrelationships
          between child labour and education. Their programme helps to address
          the everyday situation of government schools such as multigrade
          learning, absenteeism, the needs of special groups such as children
          with disabilities or slow learners, and children from disadvantaged
          families who need relevant education. 
Valmiki Vanam is the first ‘satellite
          school’ established with the initiative of the Rishi Valley Rural
          Education Centre (REC) in Andhra Pradesh. The children who study here
          come from poor Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe villages. There are
          17 such satellite schools. Dr Radhika Herzberger, Director, REC,
          envisages the development of the village school as a kind of village
          commons: a new kind of public space in the village, nurturing and
          rejuvenating the traditional commons and wastelands that a village
          has. 
Curriculum built around local issues could offer a solution to
          social conflicts of our times. Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Uttar
          Pradesh and Assam governments have replicated this pedagogy in their
          schools and have begun to bring in the much-awaited change. 
Studies
          of various initiatives indicate that providing computers to government
          schoolchildren is seen as a step towards digital equality, and a way
          to attract children to school. There is also a growing trend among
          corporate houses to set up trusts and foundations that can directly
          engage with social issues. Many of them recognise education as the key
          to socio-economic progress. They have provided computer labs to
          schools and have trained teachers in using computers. 
Clearly, all
          projects were ultimately dependent on how the teachers received these
          intrusions. Their sustenance also depended on gaining additional
          spaces for teachers for academic and professional work within the
          school system. 
Although few in expanse, the 23 initiatives give a
          wonderful idea about how enjoyable learning in government schools can
          be. The dream to make poor children learn with joy is still within
          reach. — WFS
The writer is a former Director of the National
          Book Trust