| 
 | 
| 
 | 
| Mahatma’s vital concern Brahmacharya: Gandhi & His Women Associates A MOBILE
        exhibition that visited our village during the centenary of Mahatma
        Gandhi’s birth in 1969 depicted dozens of his photographs from that of
        a toddler in Porbandar to his last journey on a gun carriage in New
        Delhi. However, the image that remained etched in my mind was that of a
        toothless old man with a beatific smile on his face and clutching at a
        staff. Years later when I read Arthur Koestler’s controversial, some say,
        racist, book The Robot and The Lotus, I was shocked to read about
        some of Gandhi’s mind-boggling views on sex. It described a particular
        incident in which the British police who had gone to arrest him found
        Gandhi and a nubile girl sleeping on the same bed in a state of
        undress. Girja Kumar, who is credited with setting up the prestigious
        Sapru House library in New Delhi, throws light on a slightly uncharted
        aspect of Gandhiji’s life—his relationship with a bevy of women. His
        admiration for Gandhiji is apparent but that does not prevent him from
        calling a spade a spade.  From his days in South Africa where he went
        as a struggling lawyer, women of all nationalities were attracted to
        Gandhiji like bees to honey. He always felt, though seldom admitted,
        that Kasturba, whom he married at the age of 13, could not provide him
        intellectual companionship.  So he looked for and found women of his
        choice who could understand the role he played and the politics he
        pursued. Unlike most others, Gandhiji was brutally frank about his
        relationships with women, though many of his confidants with the
        singular exception of Jawaharlal Nehru, who was "diplomatic",
        found them questionable. Women were simply guinea pigs for his weird
        experiments in brahmacharya. Gandhiji had difficulty in coming to terms
        with as basic an instinct as sex. He found it an abhorrent urge, the
        control of which would make him great. And he was ready to go to any
        length to perfect his state of married celibacy. An incident that
        happened soon after his marriage influenced him a great deal. His father
        was on his deathbed and Gandhiji was massaging his legs when he had an
        arousal. He rushed to Kasturba, woke her up, had sex and returned to his
        father’s bed to find him dead. The thought that he was dying exactly
        when he was copulating haunted him all his life. "I cannot imagine
        a thing as ugly as the intercourse as man and woman", he once said.
        Thus began his famous battle against sex which he never won, not because
        he was not earnest or full-hearted in his attempt but because he fought
        against the all-powerful Nature.  For all his greatness as a mass
        leader, philosopher and thinker, Gandhiji had idiotic ideas about many
        aspects of sex. He forsook milk because it stimulated "the lower
        passion of man’s nature" forcing a vitriolic comment from his
        first known female friend Millie Graham Polak, "If that be so`85
        then young children who are principally fed on milk would be nothing but
        horrible little brutes". Barely 23 years after his marriage, he
        renounced sex because he believed that if he got enamoured of Kasturba
        and indulged in sexual gratification, he would fall the very instant.
        "My work would go to the dogs and I would lose in a twinkling all
        that power which would enable one to achieve swaraj". All his
        higher education did not equip him to discard the notion that semen
        which he called "vital fluid" was "God’s gift to be
        preserved, stored and retained under all circumstances". It was as
        if swaraj lay in semen. While he practised abstinence with perfection
        making his bedroom a torture chamber, he agonised over his involuntary
        discharges exposing his ignorance of the biological functions of the
        body.  There were many women social climbers who were in his charmed
        circle but there were others who found him sexually attractive and
        sought gratification through him. Without exception, he used all of them
        as his "walking sticks" or as tools in his grand but grotesque
        laboratory of brahmacharya. What did the women get in return? He
        regretted that he adopted "Lakhsmi," a Harijan who ended her
        life in obscurity, he got a married girl Jeki exposed to public ridicule
        by forcing her to cut her hair just because she made the mistake of
        kissing his son, he subjected his wife to torture of all kinds,
        conditioned many of his women friends like Sonja Schlesin, Sushila
        Nayyar and Mirabehn to remain spinsters all their lives and ruined the
        family life of friends like Jayaprakash Narayan. Why? The author
        answers, "Probably he loved no once except himself". There is
        a touching episode in the book where his elder son Harilal, a drunkard
        who once became a Muslim, shouts "Mata Kasturba ki jai" when
        the Jabalpur Mail in which the Gandhis were travelling reached Katni
        station. He thrust an orange, which he had begged from a fruit vendor,
        into her hands and said, "Ba, it is exclusively for you. If you don’t
        eat it, give it back to me". When Gandhiji solicited a portion of
        the "booty" as his patrimony, Harilal brusquely rejected his
        request, "No. It is exclusively for Ba. He also added an advice to
        him. "All your greatness is owed to her". When the train
        moved, they heard the distant cry, "Mata Kasturba ki jai".
         He was a Mahatma for the world but for his family he was the Old
        Testament God spitting brimstone and fire. Girja Kumar’s is an
        enjoyable book that calls for tighter editing to eliminate repetitions
        and proof mistakes.
         
 |