|
|
|
Review fee hike proposal
From the next academic year, the students’ college fee could double or even triple. Based on the recommendation of the National Knowledge Commission, the Planning Commission is likely to suggest an increase in fee for higher education to Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram.
This is expected to happen before the Union Budget 2007-08. Consequently, it would make education an exclusive preserve of the rich. Of course, Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia has his own justification for this when the present fee covers just 5 per cent of the cost of education. But who is going to suffer by this? The proposed hike in education fee is wholly unjustified as it will put graduate and post-graduate education out of the reach of many sections. There is need for a review of the proposed fee hike. Md ZIYAULLAH KHAN,
Camp: Pune
|
Pangs of growthGurgaon town is growing by leaps and bounds. Presently, it consists of 56 sectors. The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) has planned 51 additional sectors by 2021 in the Master Plan touching IMT Manesar. Then comes the realm of Special Economic Zones — 600 acres by Orient Craft, 10,000 acres by
HSIDC, 25,000 acres by Reliance Industries Limited, 20,000 acres by DLF and 5,000 acres by Raheza Group. Many more players may join the bandwagon by 2021. HUDA is also planning the expansion of Dharuhera complex from the other end. By 2021, Gurgaon town would become a monstrous city of 400 sectors! With the existing drainage system, Gurgaon cannot bear even a single 50 mm rainfall of two hours. Environmental and ecological problems will further compound the sustainable issues. Will the Haryana government and NCR authorities realise the gravity of the situation and apply a mid-course correction expeditiously? RAM NIWAS
MALIK, Engineer-in-Chief (retd),Panckhula
Give them their dueThe defence services’ demand for representation in the pay commissions and de-linking of their pay scales from those of civil services has always fallen on deaf ears. It is a pity that a soldier gets lesser pay than even a peon though the former serves in snow, desert, rain, forest and against all heavy odds than the latter. Most soldiers retire around 35-37 years of age after which they have to fend for themselves. There is no system to provide them an alternative career to eke out a living. The shabby treatment to the soldiers who have given their best to the country is a national shame. We need to restore pride and social status of the soldier, serving and retired. Conditions must be created to help soldier live with dignity. Lt-Col BHAGWANT SINGH
(retd), Mohali

|