Chandigarh, February 16
The structures of discrimination and exclusion, which constitute the multi-layered marginality of the Indian Muslims cannot be addressed by merely allocating more economic resources to the community. In order to effectively deal with the problems of the Muslims, the politicians must first look into these mechanisms of complicity of the state apparatus so as to make them feel that their life and property was secure in this country,” said Dr Bhagwan Josh, Centre for Historical Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, during the concluding day of the national seminar on "Meanings of Marginality in Modern India" organised by the Department of Political Science, Panjab University today.
Speaking on ‘Nehru, constitution and the making of Muslim marginality’, Dr Josh pointed out that in his writings Nehru continued to harp on ‘composite country’ and ‘composite state’. “But he never felt the need to clarify these concepts. In practice Nehru implemented the notion of ‘composite culture’ in a way which went against the very idea of common citizenship and maintained the pre-partitioned conception of communities being fundamentally different from each other,” he said.
He said that it should have been logical that a leader like him insist on legislating a uniform civil code for all the Indian women irrespective of their caste and religious belonging. “The exclusivist idea of a Hindu code bill should have alerted if not alarmed him to its future consequences. In the aftermath of partition here was an opportunity for him to implement his ideological conviction for which he had fought so hard during his negotiations with Jinnah and Muslim league. This single act of statesmanship of passing the uniform civil code on his part would have considerably neutralised some of the deep seated anger and resentment against the Muslims of this country,’ he said.
The other speakers included Yogendra Yadav, Debi Chatterjee, Shashi Joshi, Kamlesh Mohan, A.S. Narang, V. SriRanjani, Birendra P. Singh and Surinder S. Jodhka. Yogendra Yadav posed what he called the central paradox of 21st century India, which is the coexistence of persistent poverty with democracy. He said that Indian democracy had the potential but institutions and policies did not translate this into practice.
Many speakers spoke about the experiences of religious communities and dalits in India. The deliberations in the seminar pointed towards what should be the future agenda of research and policy making.
