| 
 | 
| 
 | 
| 
 Shakespeare’s Cinema of Crime. Crime writers (how can we
          neglect William Shakespeare within this genre?) can be considered
          significant sources of inquiry into the intricacies of the criminal
          mind, leading to the development of theoretical approaches for
          conceptualising criminal behaviour and social control.  This book by
          R.S. White has given new dimensions to Shakespeare by associating him
          with modern-day crime thrillers in cinematic form. Numerous plot-lines
          of Hollywood films are shown to have been inspired by two of
          Shakespeare’s tragic plays — Macbeth and Hamlet. The
          interesting component is the crime theme. As White argues: "When
          we look at cinematic crime thrillers, detective stories and film noirs
          in general, we can see the recurrence of at least some generic
          features drawn from Macbeth and Hamlet especially. The
          first provides the basis of a murderer’s guilt, a prevailing
          atmosphere of menace, and the most famous femme fatale in
          literary history — adding up to the ingredients for film noir; (the
          latter) the prototype for an investigative detective on the tracks of
          a murderer and becoming implicated himself for personal revenge for
          the death of a family member."  Resemblance between Shakespeare’s
          plays and modern-day cinematic representations, as the book reveals,
          is not merely at the level of form; the categories of analysis are
          indeed genre-based. They become tools with which larger motivations
          are explored. The appeal for use of Shakespeare on the screen is the
          dark amoral nature of characters such as Macbeth and Lady Macbeth as
          well as Hamlet. All these characters stand out as vivid examples of
          violent behaviour as also the suffering that is felt within as a
          result of the action.  The twentieth century sees in their behaviour
          something akin to its ways of thinking. This may be one reason why
          White chose cinema as the genre for questioning and investigation of
          the causes behind crime. Within this context, the 1940s are taken as
          the starting point of what is considered the noir-corporate or
          war-noir. If the issue is taken up with respect to technological
          developments, the noir could be extended to "docu-noir" too:
          "The term was coined in 1946 by the French critic Nino Frank to
          indicate a particular kind of Roman noir, and descriptions first aired
          in the early 1940s (even before the term was invented) which
          established it as a distinctive visual style or movement rather than a
          genre in its own right. There are several sub-sub-genres depending on
          the context and setting: corporate noir replaces a criminal underworld
          with an executive suite and it has become more and more common as a
          setting for conscious adaptations of Macbeth such as Joe
          Macbeth (1955), Men of Respect (1991), and Maqbool
          (2003). Other hybrid and related forms have been treated as discrete,
          but some basic structural, narrative and stylistic elements occur in
          each." Thus we see that even as genres appear, the corporate is
          replaced by the criminal underworld, which means that the two are not
          just related but in fact integral to one another. The reference in
          large measure to Indian films is instructive. Maqbool and Omkara
          suggest the presence of the sinister in Indian conditions. Matters
          of state at the highest level in Shakespeare’s texts are shown in
          their Indian representations as brash and superficial. In Shakespeare,
          psychology was emphasised whereas in these two films, verbal crudities
          and violent ways are in the forefront. This is vaguely suggested by
          "sub-sub-genres depending on the context and setting". A
          tribute to Shakespeare’s genius but it may come out as gross misuse
          of Shakespeare as a valuable intellectual resource. White says:
          "Many ‘purists’ amongst Shakespeare admirers (may be) shocked
          to find the plays they revere brought into the same orbit as the
          popular film industry and ‘trashy’ B-movies."  The breadth
          and scope of Shakespeare’s vision are indeed the stamp of his
          brilliance that has its impact both on the high and the low. 
 
 | ||