A hatchet is buried : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

A hatchet is buried

AFTER four senior judges of the Supreme Court had, on Friday, staged a tableau of delirious discord, a tense congeniality descended upon the Supreme Court Monday morning.

A hatchet is buried


AFTER four senior judges of the Supreme Court had, on Friday, staged a tableau of delirious discord, a tense congeniality descended upon the Supreme Court Monday morning. The dissenting judges attended court as usual, and Attorney-General KK Venugopal, the most respected legal luminary around, declared that the storm in the tea cup had petered out. A key republican institution has been spared a prolonged crisis. Various Bar associations and former judges lent their services and advice, just as anguished voices from the civil society pitched in with their expectations of statesman-like behaviour from the Chief Justice of India and the rest of the Bench.     

No one, of course, knows the terms of reconciliation between the two factions in the court. The four dissenting judges had flagged down a critical issue about the manner in which the Chief Justice was discharging his responsibility as the master of the court roster. If the judges have gone back to work it must be presumed that they have been given some satisfaction and assurance on this sensitive point. Even though they rendered themselves open to the charge of breaking ranks and traditions by holding a press conference, there was nothing malicious in the judges’ act; in fact, they did a great service to the institution by inviting a public spotlight on its internal functioning. Expectedly, there were convulsions, inside and outside the apex court, and suddenly the small minds were jolted out of their arrogant complacency and petty-mindedness.  Too much of anonymity and too tightly-closed doors do not always produce wholesome or wise decisions. 

Any institution is only as good as the people who man it. The Supreme Court is not immune from this principle. And, it must be presumed that the differences among honourable judges were not simply procedural about Bench formation; there are bound to be differences as to how to deal with other organised centres of power in these divisive and demanding times. The citizens need to be reassured that there is no dilution in the Supreme Court’s institutional role as the guarantor of the republic’s  equanimity and equilibrium.

Top News

Jailed gangster-politician Mukhtar Ansari dies of cardiac arrest

Jailed gangster-politician Mukhtar Ansari dies of cardiac arrest

Ansari was hospitalised after he complained of abdominal pai...

Delhi High Court dismisses PIL to remove Arvind Kejriwal from CM post after arrest

Delhi High Court dismisses PIL to remove Arvind Kejriwal from CM post after arrest

The bench refuses to comment on merits of the issue, saying ...

Arvind Kejriwal to be produced before Delhi court today as 6-day ED custody ends

Excise policy case: Delhi court extends ED custody of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal till April 1

In his submissions, Kejriwal said, ‘I am named by 4 witnesse...

‘Unwarranted, unacceptable’: India on US remarks on Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest

‘Unwarranted, unacceptable’: India on US remarks on Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest

MEA spokesperson says India is proud of its independent and ...

Gujarat court sentences former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt to 20 years in jail in 1996 drug case

Gujarat court sentences former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt to 20 years in jail in 1996 drug case

Bhatt, who was sacked from the force in 2015, is already beh...


Cities

View All