Avoid confrontation : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Avoid confrontation

The immediate challenge before the governments in Punjab and Haryana is to maintain law and order in view of the INLD's call for a march to the Punjab border to dig the controversial SYL link canal.



The immediate challenge before the governments in Punjab and Haryana is to maintain law and order in view of the INLD's call for a march to the Punjab border to dig the controversial SYL link canal. The Supreme Court has asserted that the canal cannot be delayed further. The INLD posturing is political, aimed at preserving its shrinking political base with the Chautala father-son duo in jail. The Punjab Police has wisely averted a possible showdown by not letting All-India Sikh Student Federation activists reach the site of the INLD protest. Though the Haryana government has allowed Chautala men to gather and stage their political drama, it cannot afford to let them cross the line for a peaceful democratic protest.

The more difficult challenge is for Punjab to implement the stern Supreme Court directive: build the canal whether or not there is water to carry. There is almost a political consensus in the state as was reflected in the Assembly resolution and the Congress resignations that Punjab has not a drop of additional river water to spare for Haryana. Over the years all the ruling political parties have failed to put up a convincing case for the state either in court or outside. A politically acceptable and saleable solution was possible with the BJP in power at the Centre, in Haryana and in a coalition with the Akali Dal but electorally milking the water issue seemed more important than finding a lasting solution.  

The past aggressive political posturing on the SYL would make the new government in Punjab less flexible and possibly pit it against the apex court. Already the Centre has taken a pro-Haryana stance in the Supreme Court and it is expected to be less cooperative if Punjab gets a non-Akali Dal government. Punjab will have to rebuild and reposition its case, based on sound legal facts rather than adopt the path of confrontation or cry victimhood. Courts or tribunals rule on the issue at hand on the basis of legal arguments backed by evidence. In the long run the larger issue for both states is how to cut waste and manage efficiently the existing water resources. 

Top News

Bridges burnt—can Arvind Kejriwal and AAP recover from the Swati Maliwal controversy?

Bridges burnt—can Arvind Kejriwal and AAP recover from the Swati Maliwal controversy

While BJP makes it all about women’s ‘asmita’, unverified vi...

Interim bail eludes JMM leader Hemant Soren as Supreme Court defers hearing to Tuesday

Interim bail eludes JMM leader Hemant Soren as Supreme Court defers hearing to Tuesday

A Bench of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Dipankar Datta ...

Ghatkopar hoarding collapse accused brought to Mumbai, to be produced in court

Ghatkopar hoarding collapse accused brought to Mumbai, to be produced in court today

Was apprehended from Udaipur in Rajasthan on Thursday


Cities

View All