Sunday, February 25, 2018
facebook

google plus
FLASH
  • CBI registers Rs 97-cr loan default case against Simbhaoli Sugars, its CMD Gurmit Singh Mann and others
Jammu Kashmir » Courts

Posted at: Dec 15, 2016, 12:32 AM; last updated: Dec 15, 2016, 12:32 AM (IST)

Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, J&K on use of pellet guns

Asks Modi govt to file expert panel report on the weapon; next hearing Jan 30

PIL filed by Bar association

  • The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Jammu and Kashmir High Court Bar Association, Srinagar, challenging the September 22 judgment of the HC rejecting the association’s PIL plea for ban
  • The HC had dismissed the PIL, citing the expert committee set up by the Centre to explore the alternatives to pellet guns
  • The appellant pleaded that the HC had passed the order without waiting for the committee’s report
  • The appellant pleaded that the HC had passed the order without waiting for the report
Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, J&K on use of pellet guns
Youths throw stones at security personnel in Srinagar. Tribune file Photo

R Sedhuraman

Legal Correspondent

New Delhi, December 14

The Supreme Court today issued a notice to the Centre and the Jammu and Kashmir Government on a plea for banning the use of pellet guns by the security forces to deal with violence in the state.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice TS Thakur also asked the Centre to file the expert committee report on pellet guns. The Bench was hearing an appeal by the J&K High Court Bar Association, Srinagar, challenging the September 22 judgment of the High Court rejecting the association’s PIL plea for ban.

Appearing for the petitioner, counsel Manzoor Ahmad pleaded that alternatively the Magistrate should be present at the trouble spot when the security forces resort to such action.

Arguing for the Centre, Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said making the presence of the Magistrate mandatory was not feasible. Under the standard operating procedure (SOP), the order could be issued by the Magistrate or the senior most police officer.

The state’s counsel Sunil Fernandes said the security forces were following the SOP and the Centre had classified pellet guns as a non-lethal weapon.

The High Court had dismissed the PIL, citing the expert committee set up by the Centre to explore the alternatives to pellet guns. The appellant pleaded that the High Court had passed the order without waiting for the committee’s report.

The nature and extent of the force required to be used at the relevant point of time or situation would have to be decided by the persons in charge of the place where the attack was happening, the High Court had held. The apex court slated the next hearing for January 30.

COMMENTS

All readers are invited to post comments responsibly. Any messages with foul language or inciting hatred will be deleted. Comments with all capital letters will also be deleted. Readers are encouraged to flag the comments they feel are inappropriate.
The views expressed in the Comments section are of the individuals writing the post. The Tribune does not endorse or support the views in these posts in any manner.
Amid clashes, Ludhiana sees 59% turnoutMC Polls

Amid clashes, Ludhiana sees 59% turnout

25 Feb 2018 | 1:40 AM
The Bent & the Beautiful are well and kicking…KAFFEEKLATSCH

The Bent & the Beautiful are well and kicking…

25 Feb 2018 | 1:29 AMby Harish Khare
I, The Indian & My ArmyMockingbird

I, The Indian & My Army

25 Feb 2018 | 1:29 AMby Saba Naqvi
NiMoNia

NiMoNia

25 Feb 2018 | 1:29 AMby Sanjeev Sharma in New Delhi
Share On