Thursday, August 17, 2017
facebook

google plus
FLASH
  • Bomb alert at Delhi High Court
Nation

Posted at: Jan 19, 2017, 1:59 AM; last updated: Jan 19, 2017, 2:04 AM (IST)

Judicial tribunals being merged to lower count

Process set rolling to bring them under Law Ministry

HC wants AFT out of Defence Ministry purview

  • The law ministry will be implementing the recommendations of an inter-ministerial group on reforms of tribunals in three phases over nine months. This also includes the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), the functioning of which has recently come under scrutiny of the SC
  • In the case of Navdeep Singh versus Union of India, the Punjab and Haryana HC had ruled that the AFT be taken out of the purview of the Ministry of Defence and placed under the Law Ministry as per SC directions. The MoD challenged the verdict in the SC where it is currently pending

Vijay Mohan

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, January 18

Following repeated directions from the Supreme Court and high courts, the Centre has initiated the process of placing all judicial tribunals under the nodal control of the Ministry of Law and Justice.

The number of tribunals, which provide judicial redressal to service-related grievances of employees, is also being reduced from 36 to 18 by merging those having similar or overlapping mandates, sources said. Except for the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, all tribunals function under administrative control of the ministry against which they hear cases.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

Sources said the recommendations of the inter-ministerial group on reforms of tribunals were submitted to the government about a month ago and the law ministry would be implementing them in three phases over nine months. This also includes the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), the functioning of which has recently come under scrutiny of the apex court. In the case of Navdeep Singh versus Union of India, the Punjab and Haryana High Court had ruled that the AFT be taken out of the purview of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and placed under the law ministry as per SC directions. It was averred that all orders by the AFT were to be passed against the MoD through its Secretary and the same ministry should not have any control over the functioning, infrastructure, facilities and selections of the AFT and the Defence Secretary could also not be a member of the committee for appointing or reappointing adjudicating members of the AFT since all orders of the AFT were meant to be passed against him. The MoD had challenged the verdict in the SC where it is currently pending.

The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court had in the case of L Chandra Kumar versus Union of India in 1997, directed the government to consider granting nodal control of tribunals to the law ministry. The SC had also deprecated direct appeals from tribunals to the SC in the same case and had ordered that tribunal decisions must be challenged in the high courts.

In 2010, in a PIL filed by the Madras Bar Association, yet another Constitution Bench had held that tribunals shall not be placed under ministries against which they have to pass orders and must be under the Law Ministry.  In 2015, a parliamentary standing committee had recommended placing of all tribunals under a “National Tribunals Commission”. The SC, in yet another order in 2016, had directed the law commission to look into the efficacy of the concept of tribunals.

COMMENTS

All readers are invited to post comments responsibly. Any messages with foul language or inciting hatred will be deleted. Comments with all capital letters will also be deleted. Readers are encouraged to flag the comments they feel are inappropriate.
The views expressed in the Comments section are of the individuals writing the post. The Tribune does not endorse or support the views in these posts in any manner.
Share On