Jurisdiction row: Centre moves SC against HC order : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Jurisdiction row: Centre moves SC against HC order

NEW DELHI: The jurisdiction row between the Centre and the Delhi government reached the Supreme Court today, with the former challenging Delhi High Court’s order that termed as “suspect” a notification of Union Home Ministry barring the Anti-corruption Branch from acting against its officials.



New Delhi, May 27

The jurisdiction row between the Centre and the Delhi government reached the Supreme Court today, with the former challenging Delhi High Court’s order that termed as “suspect” a notification of Union Home Ministry barring the Anti-corruption Branch from acting against its officials.

A Special Leave Petition (SLP) was filed in the registry of the apex court this evening challenging May 25 order of the High Court which was hearing bail application of a Delhi Police constable arrested by ACB of Delhi Government on bribery charges.

The Home Ministry had maintained that ACB had no jurisdiction over its officials whereas the Delhi Government had challenged it.

The Ministry issued a gazette notification on May 21 that the ACB police station shall not take cognisance of offences against officials, employees and functionaries of the central government services besides giving the Delhi LG absolute powers on transfers and postings of senior officers.

However, while dismissing the bail application of the constable, the High Court termed as “suspect” the Centre’s notification barring Delhi government’s ACB from acting against its officers in criminal offences and held that the LG cannot act on his discretion.

The High Court noted that Lieutenant Governor of Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) is bound to act upon the aid and advice of the council of ministers who are directly elected by the citizens of Delhi and the Centre’s “executive fiat” siding with him is “suspect”.

It observed that mandate of the people “must” be respected by the LG of GNCTD if there was no other “constitutional or legal fetter”.

“In my view, since the Union lacks the executive authority to act in respect of matters dealt with in Entries 1 & 2 of List III of the Seventh Schedule, the further executive fiat issued by the Union Government on May 21, 2015 is also suspect,” Justice Vipin Sanghi had said in his order.

The order came on the day when Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal had taken to streets and was holding an ‘open cabinet meeting’ in central Delhi against the alleged oppressive measures being used by the Centre to curtail powers of the Delhi government.

According to the sources in the Home ministry, the SLP will primarily argue that the High Court had made the observations without hearing its views. — PTI

Top News

Excise 'scam': AAP to be made accused in money-laundering case, ED tells Delhi High Court

Excise 'scam': AAP will be made co-accused in money laundering case, ED tells Delhi High Court

Political parties can be prosecuted for money laundering, De...

1 dead, 7 rescued after fire breaks out at Income Tax office in Delhi

1 official dead, 7 rescued after massive fire breaks out at Income Tax office in Delhi

The I-T department says there is no data loss pertaining to ...


Cities

View All