|Saturday, July 19, 2003||
IF I pay a tribute to Bhisham Sahni, who passed away last week, in a TV column, it is because his Tamas will always remain a classic for Indian television.
I first met him when we were together at The Indian Institute of Advanced Study in Shimla, where I was writing my autobiography and he was in residence as an honoured Emeritus writer who was free to write whatever he wanted. Also in residence was eminent Hindi writer Krishna Sobti. It was the age of the Ramayana and Mahabharata on TV and all the domestic staff insisted on serving breakfast at crack of dawn on Sundays so that they could watch the epics on TV. There they were also joined by the professors.
And then came Tamas which
was Sahni’s highly moving and true-to-life epic on the pangs of people
fleeing into India during Partition. I was privileged to be on the
National Jury for awards for films and we gave Tamas a national
award although not without a struggle. Tamas, the novel, had
originally been made into a feature film by Govind Nihalani and some
jurors felt that the TV version was not eligible for a film award. But
that was fortunately overcome.
But while Shimla was my first encounter with Sahni in person, it was many years before that I received his biography of his brother Balraj Sahni which came out after Balraj’s death. It came with a little note from Bhisham, asking if I would care to review it. Apart from the fact that Balraj was one of the finest actors who has ever graced the Indian cinema, he had been a warm personal friend and Bhisham’s quiet tribute to his brother was something which was very much worth reviewing.
To return to Tamas. Govind Nihalani, who was present at Bhisham’s funeral, as was Balraj’s son Parikshit, has already recounted how he was wanting to make a film on some burning social issue and once he had read Tamas, which he found difficult to put down, he went ahead with the film which starred, among others, Om Puri and Surekha Sikri. It was almost a documentary account of the grim flight into India, done with Bhisham’s gift for meticulous detail and high emotional content and also cameraman-director Govind Nihalani’s exceptional talent and sympathy for the topic. I think it will be a fitting tribute to both if Tamas is shown during the forthcoming international film festival in Delhi. And, incidentally, two other film greats, Gregory Peck and Katherine Hepburn, should also have retrospectives in the festival.
Changing the subject. With a wide variety in settings and in those interviewed, Shekhar Gupta’s Walk the Talk on NDTV English is going from strength to strength. His chat with Hockey Star Dhanraj Pillay brought into focus the long-neglected sport of hockey, once India’s most popular and internationally successful sport, which had been ousted from adequate TV coverage by cricket. That Pillay should have come before Tendulkar and the rest on the programme, together with the hockey team being received and congratulated by President Abdul Kalam and then the sponsorship by Sahara ought to do a world of good to hockey and restore it to its former position. And TV can play a major part in this. For starters, Doordarshan as well as Star Sports and ESPN should give hockey the coverage it deserves and stop their obsession with cricket at the expense of all other sports. Compare, as Shekhar Gupta’s programme revealed, the miserable daily allowance of 20 dollars per day given to Dhanraj Pillay when abroad with the lavish lifestyle of our cricketers when they go outside the country.
That newscasting has more to it than pretty faces was amply demonstrated
by Headline India’s faux pas on Monday afternoon. Sweet young thing
Avantika was reading everything with a fixed smile, including Kaziranga.
The headline had mentioned that Indiadecision about sending troops to
Iraq "will be announced today." While the bulletin was on, the
news came through that the decision had been made. And this is how
Avantika, who does not have a clue as to which words to stress (she
always picks on the wrong ones) announced it. "India will send
troops to Iraq" (long pause as if the sentence has ended). Then:
"Only under the auspices of the United Nations". When the
headlines came on again at the end, they said: "India will decide
today whether to send troops to Iraq". So the headlines had not
been updated although the decision had come in the middle of the
bulletin nor had the newscaster noticed the change. Sab Se Tez?