The author is a great admirer of Marx. She
finds the entire works of Marx permeated with the passion for liberty.
Sadly, all this degenerated into vulgar materialism at the hands of his
followers. Thus, the Soviet Revolution that promised a new dawn for the
mankind turned out to be an anti-thesis of everything Marx stood for.
Her comments on this are truly thought provoking. She found that the
expression of free opinion in the Soviet system was impossible unless
one was, well to run the rick of being deported. In place of free play
between parties within the framework of the Soviet system, the
dictatorship of the proletariat in essence meant "one party in
power, and all the rest in prison". The bureaucracy, freed from
responsibility, controlled all economic and political power. Her
concluding observation that this bureaucracy "is in no sense
tending towards a renunciation of its powers, so that the term ‘transitional’
would in any case be wrong", has proved to be quite prophetic. It
clung to the power with all the tenacity and strength at its disposal
but the system eventually collapsed when the crisis brewed by a host of
contradictions and distortions proved too powerful to be controlled.
Today many well-known
Marxists in the world tend to agree with Simone Weil’s analysis of the
Soviet system and opine that it built a monstrous kind of state
capitalism in the name of socialism. She did not live long enough to
analyse the subsequent revolutions in the world. The distinction between
socialism and capitalism is gradually getting blurred in the Chinese
system today, to give one example, because of the free play of
multinational corporations there, thus giving rise to numerous problems
plaguing the labour class.
What are the roots of
oppression? While seeking an answer to this question, the author invokes
the central concept of Plato — also a Christian postulate — that a
beast resides in everyone. The beast makes one incapable of
distinguishing between good and evil, except in the case of souls
endowed with divine grace which alone can tame the beast.
How to attain this divine
grace, one may legitimately ask. The author has no answer. And the
answer is not easy. All organised religions in the world lay claim to
monopoly over the divine grace. However, through their senseless
crusades, inquisitions, intolerance and fanaticism they have heaped
unspeakable misery on mankind.
At times the author sounds
pessimistic and closer to the anarchist position that social order,
howsoever necessary, is, ipso facto, interwoven with oppressive
structures. The issues raised by her, however, are too fundamental to be
skipped over by social thinkers.
Simone Weil’s sombre
thoughts that often sound depressing have acquired an all-the-more
authentic ring today when one sees the mighty and the powerful marching
unchallenged in an unipolar world with hitherto unknown arrogance,
insolence and self-righteousness. Routledge Classics has done well in
bringing out a reprint of this important treatise translated by Arthur
Wills and John Petrie into flawless English.
|