|
|
Sons of Babur strikes
a chord
Khurshid, whose play is a meandering, wide-canvas reflection on Hindu-Muslim relations and the idea of India, said he hoped it would trigger a similar debate in India. "There are many people in India who are talking about bringing back Bahadur Shah Zafar’s body, as indeed they want the Kohinoor and Shivaji’s sword, (saying) that our national life remains incomplete without these being returned to India," Khurshid said. Both the Kohinoor and Shivaji’s swords were "gifted" to the British royal family, and their presence in Britain fuels periodic demands from Indian nationalists for their return. Khurshid, however, said
there could be an issue over where to bury the remains of Bahadur Shah
Zafar. "Where his body would be taken back—whether it would be
taken back to the Red Fort—would be a question." "I think it’s
something that’s been discussed peripherally in the country but I don’t
think there’s been a full of debate or discussion. "Possibly, if
this is what the play is doing, that it is exciting these questions in
your mind then hopefully this play will start the discussion in the
country and maybe we’ll find some conclusion," the politician
said. Khurshid said Bahadur Shah Zafar, who died in Rangoon (now Yangon)
in November 1862, had acquired "significance for communal unity in
our Country", as also for India’s aspiration for independence.
The Congressman received the backing of the Oxford-based Tapan
Raychaudhuri, a leading historian of British India. "I honestly
think the body should be returned to India. There is a great deal of
symbolism attached to Bahadur Shah Zafar—he was a symbol of national
unity," he said. "Although I have never considered 1857 to be
a War of Independence, it did galvanise people from all sections and
classes in India. "As far as his resting place is concerned, I
think one obvious place would be Humayun’s tomb," Raychaudhuri
added. — IANS
|