Consumers
beware!
The right to a free gift
Pushpa Girimaji
On Republic Day and a
few days before and after, many shops had announced special discounts,
prize schemes and lotteries, besides buy-one-get-one schemes. Drawn by
them, I bought a gas stove on the promise that I would get an electric
rice cooker as a free gift. I was told that the cooker was out of
stock and would be delivered to my address within a week. However, it
never came. When I made an inquiry, I was told that the scheme was
applicable only for purchases bought on January 26 and since I had
bought the stove the next day, I was not entitled to it. Now, this was
not told to me and I was clearly given an assurance that I would get
the free gift. In fact, I would not have bought the stove at all in
such a hurry, but for the rice cooker. Now what is my option? Do I
have the right to claim the promised rice cooker?
You certainly have the
right because you have been specifically promised that you would get
the free gift. If the scheme was meant only for purchases on January
26, then you should have been told about. By promising the gift and
then not giving it, the retailer and the manufacturer (if the scheme
was on behalf of the manufacturer) are both guilty of unfair trade
practice and you can lodge a complaint against them before the
consumer court. In addition to the gift, you can also ask for
compensation for the harassment caused to you and the cost of
litigation. For your benefit, let me quote a somewhat similar case
decided by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Here, the controversy
centred around the scheme "Videocon Diwali Pathaka Ek Mein
Char Ka Dhamaka," advertised by the manufacturer, under which
every purchaser of the television set got a scratch card and the gift
indicated on the card. On November 19, 2003, the complainant purchased
a television set and scratched the card given along with it by the
retailer and to his pleasant surprise, it said "5 gm of
gold!" However, when he made the claim, Videocon International,
Aurangabad, rejected it, saying that the scheme was valid only from
September 26 to October 31. Since he had not bought the set during
this period, he was not entitled to the prize. The dealer, however,
stated that he had been instructed by the manufacturer to dispose off
the stock along with the scratch card and it was only on those
directions had he given the scratch card to the customer, promising a
gift.
After hearing all the
parties, the National Commission came to the conclusion that the
dealer had clearly promised the gift in the scratch card and had
accordingly given him the card with the purchase. Whether this act of
his was under the authority of the manufacturer or not was irrelevant
to the complaint here. To deny the prize to the consumer now would
tantamount to punishing him for the confusion, if any, between the
manufacturer and the dealer. Besides, the retailer was a dealer of the
manufacturer and competent to implement the relevant scheme on their
behalf. The consumer is, therefore, entitled to the promised quantity
of gold or its value, the Commission held. (Baby Anmol Mahajan vs
Videocon International Limited and Ors, RP No 145 of 2007, decided on
18-11-2013)
How genuine are the
free gift offers being made by retailers these days? Can one trust
them?
Sometimes, to get rid of
unsold stock nearing the expiry date, manufacturers come up with
"buy-one-get-one-free" offer. Sometimes, such offers may
also be part of a promotional scheme, when a manufacturer is
introducing a new product. Or it might be a marketing gimmick to sell
a failed product. Or to get rid of seasonal clothes with the changing
season. You need to consider all these carefully before making the
purchase.
|