Los Angeles, December 4
People may feel less unethical about sharing misinformation on social media if they repeatedly encounter the fake news item, even when they don't believe it, according to a study involving more than 2,500 people.
The researchers, including one of Indian Origin -- Medha Raj from the University of Southern California in the US -- said seeing a fake headline just once leads individuals to temper their disapproval of the misinformation when they see it a second, third, or fourth time.
As part of the study, published in the journal Psychological Science, the researchers asked online survey participants to rate how unethical or acceptable they thought it was to publish a fake headline, and the likelihood that they would "like", share, and block or unfollow the person who posted it.
They found that the participants rated headlines they had seen more than once as less unethical to publish than headlines they saw for the first time.
The participants also said they were more likely to "like" and share a previously seen headline, and less likely to block or unfollow the person who posted it, according to the study.
However, they did not rate a previously seen headline as significantly more accurate than new ones.
So the main results cannot be explained by a tendency to misremember false headlines as true, the researchers said.
The team also noted that efforts used by social media companies to curtail misinformation mainly focussed on helping people distinguish fact from fiction.
They quoted the example of Facebook which has tried informing users when they try to share news that fact-checkers have flagged as false.
The researchers cautioned that such strategies may fail if users feel more comfortable sharing misinformation they know is fake when they have seen it before.
According to the scientists, repeating misinformation gives it a "ring of truthfulness" which can increase people's tendency to give it a moral pass, irrespective of whether they believe it.
Merely imagining misinformation as if it were true can have a similar effect, they said.
"The results should be of interest to citizens of contemporary democracies. Misinformation can stoke political polarization and undermine democracy, so it is important for people to understand when and why it spreads," said study co-author Daniel Effron from London Business School in the UK. PTI
All readers are invited to post comments responsibly. Any messages with foul language or inciting hatred will be deleted. Comments with all capital letters will also be deleted. Readers are encouraged to flag the comments they feel are inappropriate. The views expressed in the Comments section are of the individuals writing the post. The Tribune does not endorse or support the views in these posts in any manner.
Police, Excise officials seize hookahs from restaurants
Say they perform additional duties due to shortage of medica...
Agri Dept alert, constantly observing its movement, says ADO
The Chinese and zinc-coated thread is dangerous not only for...
Jagdish Lal feeding hungry for 20 yrs, sold property to run ...
Work of installing LED lights to begin in month, contractor ...
Says this time BJP won’t let him succeed in his attempts
1,500 security personnel to keep strict vigil, top cops take...
People visiting offices to pay bills by cheque a harried lot
No fee for now, vendors identified during survey will be eli...
To come up at Gurdwara Dukhniwaran Sahib, Kali Mata Mandir
School principals, teachers told to remain present at venue
Caught red-handed, another suspect to be nabbed soon, say co...