DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Careers Advertise with us Classifieds
Gen Z Speak Up !
Grand Independence Day Sale Know More
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Punjab and Haryana HC issues notice on tattoo artist’s plea to quash monkey possession case

Six years after his arrest under the Wildlife Protection Act, Chandigarh tattoo artist challenges complaint, alleging no monkey was ever recovered from his shop

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Image credit/iStock.
Advertisement

Six years after tattoo artist Kamaljit Singh was arrested for allegedly keeping a monkey at his shop and circulating its pictures and videos on social media, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued notice to the Forest and Wildlife Department, Chandigarh, on his petition seeking quashing of the complaint.

Advertisement

Kamaljit Singh, owner of M/s Kamz Inkzone tattoo shop, Sector 35, Chandigarh, and his manager were arrested after the Department of Forest and Wildlife received a complaint dated July 24, 2020, alleging that they had kept a Rhesus Macaque (monkey) at the shop and regularly shared videos featuring the animal on social media.

Advertisement

Following the complaint, the Chief Wildlife Warden registered a case under Sections 9, 2(16)(b), 39 and 51 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. Both accused were arrested on August 19, 2020, for alleged violations of the Act.

Advertisement

In his petition filed through advocate Harlove Singh Rajput, Kamaljit Singh has sought quashing of the complaint and all subsequent proceedings. He argued that the case was based on allegations of keeping a Rhesus Macaque at his shop, but no such animal was ever recovered from the premises despite repeated inspections by wildlife authorities.

The petitioner claimed that the complaint was based on conjectures and unverified social media material, without any independent investigation or supporting evidence. He further alleged that he was subjected to unnecessary harassment despite cooperating with authorities and that no link had been established between him and the alleged offence under the Wildlife Protection Act.

Advertisement

The High Court has issued notice to the Forest Department, Chandigarh, seeking its response on August 6.

Read what others can’t with The Tribune Premium

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts