Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Tribunal orders Rs 18 lakh to be paid to family of man killed in road mishap 

The accident took place due to the negligence of the car driver, the deceased’s wife claimed  

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh, has directed the insurance company, the driver and the owner of a car to pay a compensation of Rs 18.34 lakh to the wife and children of Kuldeep Singh, who died in a road accident nine years ago.

Advertisement

Seema Devi, resident of a village in Ambala, in the claim petition filed under the Motor Vehicles Act, said that on April 18, 2016, her husband who was driving a car was hit by a rashly driven car and later succumbed to his injuries. The accident took place due to the negligence of the car driver, she claimed.

Advertisement

She said her husband was 28 at the time and ran a canteen at a factory and a dairy in the village and earned around Rs 30,000 a month. He was the sole breadwinner of the family, she said.

As the driver and owner of the car failed to appear in the court, they were proceeded against ex parte. The insurance company resisted the claim plea on the grounds that the driver did not have a driving licence.

After hearing the arguments, the tribunal held that all respondents were liable to pay the compensation.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement