Insurance firm told to pay Rs 8 lakh compensation : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Consumer Forum: Death due to LPG cylinder blast

Insurance firm told to pay Rs 8 lakh compensation

HOSHIARPUR: The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, here, has directed United India Insurance Company Limited to pay compensation to the complainants to the tune of Rs 8,00,000 with interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum till realisation and litigation expenses of Rs 10,000 in a case of death due to reported leakage in a domestic LPG cylinder.



Our Correspondent

Hoshiarpur, August 13

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, here, has directed United India Insurance Company Limited to pay compensation to the complainants to the tune of Rs 8,00,000 with interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum till realisation and litigation expenses of Rs 10,000 in a case of death due to reported leakage in a domestic LPG cylinder.

Forum’s president Karnail Singh and member Harvimal Dogra decided the case.

A complaint in this regard was filed by Parkash Singh, his son Manjeet Singh and the latter’s children — Gurwinderjit Singh and Parabjot Singh (sons) and Kirandeep Kaur (daughter), all residents of Odhra village in Dasuya against HP Gas, Mumbai; distributor Dasuya Gas Service, Dasuya; and United India Insurance Company Limited.

Parkash had said in the complaint that he was living with his wife, son, daughter-in-law, and grand children. On June 12, 2015, Kawalpreet Kaur, the daughter-in-law of Parkash, changed the LPG cylinder. After around 30 minutes when she went to the kitchen and switched on the gas, the cylinder exploded due to which her clothes caught fire and she fell on the floor.

Parkash helped her extinguish the fire and took her to a hospital. The complainants had alleged that the accident occurred due to the supply of a defective cylinder. They had alleged that the refilled LPG cylinder supplied to the consumer was defective, which resulted in the accident and death of Kawalpreet. Her statement was also recorded under Section 164, CrPC, by Amardeep Singh, JMIC, Jalandhar, on June 13, 2015, and accordingly, a DDR was also filed on the same day. However, she died on June 18, 2015. The complainants had demanded compensation as the mishap occurred due to the deficiency in services provided by the opposite parties.

Meanwhile, the distributor and the gas company stated that the complainant failed to report the matter to them due to which the spot inspection could not be done. When the matter came to their notice after receiving summons from the district consumer forum, a detailed investigation was conducted. The investigation report indicated that the possible cause of accident was negligence in using the cylinder and, as such, they were not liable to pay the compensation. As per investigation report, the cylinder was manufactured in 2012 and the date for the next testing was in 2022. Hence, there was no question of supply of a defective cylinder.

However, the gas company in its reply said it had insured all its registered domestic LPG consumers and submitted that a number of times they requested to the complainants to provide a written intimation of the mishap along with the claim by a duly authorised person to proceed for the settlement of the case with the insurance company. But they complainants never cooperated with them.

The insurance company said as the claim of the complainants had been repudiated by them prior to the filing of the present complaint vide a letter, dated July 24, 2017, there is no deficiency of service on their part.

Listening to the arguments of the counsels from both sides, the forum held both distributor and the company liable for supplying the defective cylinder. It decided that the husband and the children of the deceased were entitled to get the compensation whereas her father-in-law was not entitled for the same.

The order

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum has directed the insurance firm to pay Rs 8 lakh compensation to the complainants with interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of repudiation of the claim till realisation and to pay the litigation expenses of Rs 10,000. The compliance of the order should be made within 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.

Top News

PM Modi targets Rahul Gandhi, says after Amethi, Congress' ‘sahabzade’ will lose Wayanad seat also

PM Modi targets Rahul Gandhi, says after Amethi, Congress' ‘sahabzade’ will lose Wayanad seat also

Modi says some INDIA bloc leaders left Lok Sabha and moved t...

US sanctions Chinese suppliers for providing critical components of Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme

US sanctions Chinese suppliers for providing critical components of Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme

As a result of the action, all property and interests in pro...

Iraq's popular mobilization forces post hit in air strike, sources say

Iraq's popular mobilization forces post hit in air strike, sources say

US official said there had been no US military activity in I...

Indian student's death in US possibly linked to 'Blue Whale Challenge': Report

Indian student's death in US possibly linked to 'Blue Whale Challenge': Report

The 20-year-old, who will remain unnamed here in deference t...


Cities

View All