Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
  • ftr-facebook
  • ftr-instagram
  • ftr-instagram
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Modi’s grand dream turns sour

His policies and divisive politics have contributed to the Congress’ revival
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

MARTIN Luther King Jr had a dream. Xi Jinping had a dream. Going into the campaign for this year’s Lok Sabha elections, Narendra Modi, too, had a dream. He imagined 400-plus seats for the National Democratic Alliance (NDA). This week, the dream went sour. In 2014, Modi’s major political contribution was to revive the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). In 2024, his biggest political contribution has been the revival of the Indian National Congress.

Advertisement

A younger, youthful and energetic Congress has emerged from a decade of being on the back foot.

Of course, Rahul Gandhi came into his own with his Bharat Jodo Yatra and Mallikarjun Kharge provided mature and wise leadership. But the policies of Modi’s second term and the politics of his divisive and low-level electoral campaign played their part in the revival of the Congress’ fortunes. Modi launched the 2014 election campaign declaring that he would make India ‘Congress-mukt’. At the end of the 2024 polls, the party should thank him for doing his bit in its revival. A younger, youthful and energetic Congress has emerged from a decade of being on the back foot.

Modi is on course to make history with a third term as prime minister. The question is: What would a weaker Modi mean for the stability of a Modi-led NDA government? More importantly, what would an NDA government dependent on allies like N Chandrababu Naidu and Nitish Kumar mean for policy? Modi’s ‘guarantees’ were for a Modi government. Neither Naidu nor Nitish are ideologically inclined towards that agenda, even if the pursuit of power keeps them on Modi’s side. But, would it?

Advertisement

June 2024 feels very much like May 2004. Every political analyst and pollster predicted victory for the NDA under the leadership of then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. When the results came in, the stock market took a deep dive. Within hours, a new alliance, the United Progressive Alliance, was cobbled together, and with the outside support of the Left Front, a government was formed under the leadership of Manmohan Singh. Modi is not a Vajpayee, even if Amit Shah is a Pramod Mahajan. Vajpayee stepped back. Will Modi and Shah step back? After all, the election campaign was about ‘Modi ki Guarantee’. Is an NDA government willing to honour his guarantees?

The nation has thrust an important duty on Naidu and Nitish. Neither has proved to be a man of integrity or vision. Both have been self-serving and desperate for power. Yet, history has a strange way of demanding heroism from ordinary people. Recall how PV Narasimha Rao was assigned that role by fate and politics. On the verge of political retirement, packing his bags to become a pujari in a temple, Rao was not only made PM but also tasked with taking decisions that changed the course of the country’s destiny. Can Nitish and Naidu play such a role as junior partners of a government dominated and controlled by Modi and Shah? Hardly. They would be kept in check on a daily basis by all the institutions at the command of the PM.

Advertisement

To avoid that danger to their personal and political careers and, more importantly, in the larger interests of the country and its federal structure, the least Naidu and Nitish should demand is that one of them gets the home ministry and the other gets finance. Surely, the INDIA parties, potentially with Kharge as the PM, may well be willing to give those two portfolios to these two gentlemen. Modi has been a lifelong hard political bargainer. Recall how he took charge of the BJP, wresting it away from Lal Krishna Advani, sidelining Sushma Swaraj and co-opting Arun Jaitley. The question is: Can Naidu and Nitish be as tough when they bargain?

There is a commonplace view within the commentariat that single-party majority governments are better than coalition ones. Facts support the opposite. In many ways, after the first post-Independence decade, the best period for the country in terms of economic development, poverty reduction, employment growth, global profile and domestic social stability was the quarter century from 1991 to 2014. It was a period in which three genial, consensual and wise gentlemen became prime ministers of India — Rao, Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh — heading coalition governments. In Rao’s case, the Congress itself functioned like a coalition. Vajpayee and Singh headed explicit coalitions. India and Indians did well through their terms in office. There is no reason to believe that a coalition government headed by another genial gentleman like Kharge would not offer stability as well as sane and sensible policies.

Given Modi’s personality, ideology and ambition, he will not leave any stone unturned in his quest for a third term. What kind of a PM he would be heading a coalition remains to be seen. How he behaves and performs will, however, depend on the wisdom and courage of his allies, his senior colleagues and the bureaucracy, which has often crawled when asked to bend. The Modi-Shah regime has weakened and suborned every institution of Indian democracy. Can Naidu and Nitish rein them in?

On his flight from Kanyakumari to New Delhi, Modi wrote an essay, making three key points. First, that henceforth India would only be Bharat. If is to be made official, it would require a constitutional amendment that he may no longer be able to push through. Second, Modi outlined a new definition of the word ‘reform’ by suggesting that the country needs reform in ‘every aspect of life’. Would a diminished Modi command the nation’s regard to be able to provide leadership for that kind of reform? Third, Modi imitated Chinese President Xi by referring to the need for the country to have a ‘New Dream’. A decade ago, Xi made much of his ‘China Dream’ — borrowing the older idea of the ‘American Dream’. The American Dream and the China Dream were both about people ‘living the good life’. Modi says the country should dream to be Viksit Bharat.

India will be Viksit, irrespective of who leads the Union Government next. So, even though Modi’s dream of 400-plus in the Lok Sabha has not been realised, the nation’s dream of becoming a developed country will be realised, over time. As for Modi and the BJP, their dreams have gone sour and disrupted by an electoral wake-up call.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
'
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper