Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

8 sent to judicial custody in India Gate protest case

Photo for representational purpose only. iStock

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

A Delhi court on Saturday remanded eight accused in the India Gate anti-pollution protest case to two-day judicial custody after police produced them before the judge’s residence and sought seven-day police custody.

Advertisement

The court directed that the accused be produced again on Monday.

Advertisement

During the hearing, Delhi Police strongly opposed bail for six of the accused, stating that new video material had emerged allegedly linking the students to a Naxalite-affiliated organisation.

Appearing before Judicial Magistrate First Class Aridaman Singh Cheema at Patiala House Courts, DCP (New Delhi) Devesh Mahla said, “There is video evidence on record showing that some of the accused attended a conference of the Radical Students Union (RSU) held in Hyderabad on February 21 and 22.”

He added that several more videos were being retrieved from social media, purportedly showing the students’ support for the Naxalite movement.

Advertisement

Opposing bail, the police argued that they required custody to confront the accused with the newly recovered evidence. “We will need their police custody to confront them with the new evidence. If released on bail, they may influence witnesses,” DCP Mahla told the court.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement