Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Inside the CapitalBenchmarkShow StopperJammu JournalKashmir AngleHill ViewStraight DriveLondon LetterCanada Calling
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Delhi’s women hail quota move, but concerns remain over implementation

While many women welcomed the move as a long-pending step towards political inclusion, a significant section remained wary of how effectively it would translate into meaningful representation on the ground
File photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement
On the eve of the special Lok Sabha session on the proposed women’s reservation Bill, seeking to reserve 33 per cent of seats in Parliament and state legislatures, the mood in the national Capital was one of cautious optimism, tempered with questions about implementation and real impact.

Advertisement

Conversations across markets, campuses and residential colonies revealed that while many women welcomed the move as a long-pending step towards political inclusion, a significant section remained wary of how effectively it would translate into meaningful representation on the ground.

Advertisement

Aarohi, a college student, described the Bill as a “positive beginning”. “The initiative sounds good since it’s about giving women the power to represent themselves and show up for other women. I hope more concerns of women will be highlighted this way,” she said, adding that increased representation could help bring gender-specific issues into mainstream political discourse.

Echoing a similar sentiment, Shruti, a homemaker from Laxmi Nagar, said, “I think as a woman, only a woman can understand our concerns the best, so the Bill is a good idea.” For many like her, the proposal symbolises not just representation but also relatability in governance.

Aditi, a corporate professional working in Gurugram, also supported the idea, calling it “necessary in a system where women have historically been under-represented”. She added that the move could encourage more women to enter politics and break long-standing barriers.

Advertisement

However, beyond the initial support, concerns around proxy representation and ground-level realities surfaced repeatedly. Manvi, who runs a small boutique, pointed to what she described as a “pattern” in local politics. “While the idea is good, the main issue is whether it will work on the ground. Even now, there are many examples where women hold positions, but their family members are the ones actually in control, especially husbands or brothers. So the implementation of the Bill is very important. Just announcing reservation won’t be enough,” she said.

Rohan, a student who joined the conversation, highlighted structural challenges. “The Bill sounds good, but as we have often seen in the country, many policies are not implemented effectively. Politics is still a male-dominated field, so how easy will it be to find capable candidates who truly represent women’s interests?” he asked.

The role of money and muscle power in elections was another recurring concern. Vaibhav, a Delhi resident, said, “We have always seen that money and muscle power play a huge role in elections, even in student politics like DUSU. While reservation is a positive step, especially since seats are being increased, it is important that deserving candidates come forward. Otherwise, there is a risk that only those with strong political connections or influence will benefit.”

At the same time, some residents were unequivocal in their opposition to the idea of reservation itself. Sakshi, who works in production, said, “I have always been against reservation, whether in education or politics, because I believe it takes away opportunities from genuinely deserving candidates. There are already many laws in favour of women. Who is to say that these positions won’t be misused? Also, when women succeed on merit, they are often questioned. With reservation, will they be taken seriously?”

Kavya, a resident of Malviya Nagar, questioned the principle behind the policy. “I am completely against the Bill. Women have been vocal about equality and feminism, so why rely on reservation? If someone is deserving, they should contest on merit. Political parties can promote women candidates without bringing in quotas. Otherwise, it risks becoming a symbolic move to appear progressive, while real power may still lie elsewhere,” she said.

Despite the divergence in opinions, a common thread running through these voices was the demand for genuine empowerment rather than symbolic measures. Many emphasised that alongside reservation, there must be systemic changes--greater political training, financial support, and a shift in societal attitudes, to ensure that women representatives can function independently and effectively.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement
Advertisement