Tarun Tejpal to publish apology for 2001 article against Army officer

Advertisement

New Delhi, January 13

Journalist Tarun Tejpal has undertaken before the Delhi High Court to publish an apology in a national daily, stating that Major General MS Ahluwalia, against whom he had levelled allegations of corruption in defence procurement, had not accepted any money.

Tejpal, the proprietor of Tehelka.com, and its reporter Aniruddha Bahal have challenged a single Judge’s order awarding a compensation of Rs 2 crore to the senior Army Officer for the loss of reputation suffered by him on account of a 2001 “expose” by the news portal, alleging his involvement in corruption in defence procurement.

The counsel for Tejpal and Bahal told a Bench, led by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan, that they will deposit Rs 10 lakh each with the High Court.

The Bench, which also included Justice Manmeet PS Arora, took on record the undertaking made by the duo’s counsel and posted their appeal for disposal in April, when it would decide the quantum of damages to be paid.

On March 13, 2001, the news portal had carried a story alleging corruption in defence deals relating to import of new defence equipment. On July 21, 2023, the single Judge had directed that Rs 2 crore shall be paid by Tehelka.Com, its owner M/s Buffalo Communications, its proprietor Tarun Tejpal, and reporters Aniruddha Bahal and Mathew Samuel.

The Bench, however, stayed the proceedings on Ahluwalia’s plea seeking execution of the decree passed in his favour.

On behalf of Tejpal and Bahal, senior counsel Siddharth Luthra submitted that they were willing to publish an unconditional apology in an English national daily, specifically stating that Ahluwalia had neither asked for nor accepted any money.

Claiming that they did not have the means to pay Rs 2 crore to Ahluwalia, they said they were willing to deposit Rs 10 lakh each in two weeks.

Contending that the appeal was not maintainable, Ahluwalia’s counsel said the Army officer lived with stigma for nearly 22 years and a mere apology was not enough, Tejpal and Bahal must deposit a “substantial” amount.

The Bench said in a defamation matter like the present one, an apology was a major relief and that it will consider the quantum of damages while hearing the appeal.

(With inputs from PTI)