Accused sitting abroad can’t seek fair probe: Punjab and Haryana High Court : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Accused sitting abroad can’t seek fair probe: Punjab and Haryana High Court

Accused facing cheating and rape charges hails from Patiala village but resides in Canada

Accused sitting abroad can’t seek fair probe: Punjab and Haryana High Court


Saurabh Malik

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, July 6

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has made it clear that an accused sitting abroad can’t ask for a “fair and impartial probe” through remote control. Justice HS Madaan of the High Court also made it clear that joining of the probe was a precondition.

Justice Madaan was hearing a petition filed by an accused facing the cheating and rape charges. Hailing from a Patiala village but residing in Canada, the petitioner had moved the court, seeking directions to the police authorities to conduct fair and impartial probe on the basis of a legal representation submitted through his counsel.

The Bench, during the course of hearing, was told that the 28-year-old petitioner was an accused in an FIR registered in November 2019 under Sections 420 and 376, IPC, at Sohana police station.

Justice Madaan asserted the petition, on the face of it, was totally misconceived and unwarranted. The petitioner, accused of serious offences of cheating and rape, had not joined the probe as admitted by his counsel. As such, the petitioner wanted the court to issue direction to the official respondents with regard to the carrying out of the probe without joining it.

Justice Madaan added nothing on record was there to show that the investigation in the case was not being conducted in a fair or an impartial manner. “The petitioner is using novel method of himself remaining abroad while the FIR has been registered against him in India and sending a representation to the police authorities through his counsel making various allegations calling for conducting investigation in light thereof.”

Justice Madaan added the proper course for the petitioner-accused was to join the probe and then apprise the investigating officer (IO) of his version. “He can’t remain abroad, not join the probe and submit a representation through his counsel.” “The petitioner can certainly not file such a petition finding faults with the probe in this manner. The petition is bound to fail and is dismissed accordingly,” he concluded.


Top News

Deeply biased: MEA on US report citing human rights violations in India

Deeply biased: MEA on US report citing human rights violations in India

The annual report of the State Department highlights instanc...

Family meets Amritpal Singh in Assam jail after his lawyer claims he'll contest Lok Sabha poll from Punjab’s Khadoor Sahib

Couldn't talk due to strictness of jail authorities: Amritpal's family after meeting him in jail

Their visit comes a day after Singh's legal counsel Rajdev S...

Centre grants 'Y' category security cover to Phillaur MLA Vikramjit Chaudhary among 3 Punjab Congress rebels

Centre grants 'Y' category security to Phillaur MLA Vikramjit Chaudhary and 2 other Punjab Congress rebels

The Central Reserve Police Force has been directed by the Mi...

First Sikh court opens in UK to deal with family disputes: Report

First Sikh court opens in UK to deal with family disputes

According to ‘The Times’, the Sikh court was launched last w...


Cities

View All