Judicial reckoning : Parliament closes accountability gap
The Tribune Editorial: Judges must be protected from political pressure, yet independence cannot be confused with immunity.
THE Justice Yashwant Varma case has become a defining moment for judicial accountability in India. The former Allahabad High Court judge resigned on April 9, 2026, while facing parliamentary removal proceedings arising from the alleged discovery of large quantities of unexplained cash at his official Delhi residence after a fire in March 2025. The Lok Sabha inquiry committee has now concluded that all three charges against him — unexplained possession of cash, failure to account for it and interference with evidence — stand proved. Its more consequential finding, however, is that resignation cannot terminate a statutory inquiry once Parliament has set the process in motion.





