DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Careers Advertise with us Classifieds
Gen Z Speak Up !
Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

HC issues notice to Haryana on plea seeking review of order on guest teachers

Allegations of ‘fraud upon Court’ raised

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
The Punjab and Haryana High Court. Tribune photo
Advertisement
Less than two months after Haryana was directed to consider and regularise guest faculty teachers and lecturers working in government schools for nearly two decades, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a notice on a review petition. Among other things, it was alleged that the judgment was obtained by “practising fraud upon this Court” through suppression of material facts, concealment of binding judicial precedents and misrepresentation of the applicable legal position by the petitioners “in collusion with the State of Haryana”.

At the onset, the counsel for the applicants argued that the policy dated September 18, 2006, demonstrated the true nature and object of the engagement of guest faculty teachers. It established that such engagement was intended only to meet emergent academic requirements until regular recruitment was undertaken and “was never conceived as a regular source of recruitment or as conferring any right of continuance or regularisation”.

Advertisement

The applicants further submitted that “the entire line of binding precedents governing the controversy was deliberately withheld from this Court”. Referring to a previous judgment, they submitted that the state had pleaded that the guest faculty was engaged without any regular selection process through a limited zone of consideration and that permitting them to continue would eventually result in claims for regularisation at the cost of constitutionally eligible candidates.

Advertisement

The applicants further contended that the state’s subsequent executive attempts to perpetuate the continuance of guest teachers by granting adjustment, weightage, exemption from STET/HTET and age relaxation were “struck down by this Court” in “Ashok Kumar versus State of Haryana” on the ground that such concessions amounted to “an indirect method of regularising persons who had entered service through an irregular and noncompetitive process”.

It was added that the High Court’s view was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Mohinder Kumar versus State of Haryana, where it was “held that grant of weightage and exemption constituted an impermissible device to secure regularisation of Guest Teachers”.

Advertisement

The applicants also relied upon the Division Bench judgment in a public interest litigation seeking quashing of the state’s action in perpetuating the engagement of guest teachers and a direction to fill vacant teaching posts through the regular recruitment process in accordance with the constitutional scheme. The matter has been listed for September 9.

Read what others can’t with The Tribune Premium

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts