DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Faulty design, poor oversight led to Bhoothnath bridge collapse: CAG

Five years after inauguration, Kullu bridge failure exposes flaws in planning, execution & accountability

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu addresses the House at Tapovan in Dharamsala on Friday.
Advertisement

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has exposed serious lapses in the construction, design approval and subsequent handling of the damaged Bhoothnath bridge in Kullu district, resulting in unfruitful and avoidable expenditure amounting to Rs 14.75 crore. The findings are part of the CAG report for the period ending March 2022, which was tabled in the Vidhan Sabha by Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu, who also holds the finance portfolio.

Advertisement

The PSC (prestressed concrete) box-girder bridge, built over the Beas at a cost of Rs 10.60 crore, was opened to the public in October 2013. Shockingly, within just five years, the structure developed severe damage and had to be closed in January 2019. The report notes that the project was initially sanctioned for Rs 5.51 crore in July 2007 and later brought under NABARD’s RIDF scheme in November 2009.

Advertisement

Following its inclusion, the government issued a revised approval of Rs 8.58 crore in December 2009. However, the final expenditure shot up to Rs 10.60 crore, based entirely on the contractor’s own design. Of this, Rs 2.02 crore was spent in excess without obtaining fresh administrative sanction, an irregularity strongly criticised by the audit.

Advertisement

After the closure of the bridge in 2019, a magisterial inquiry led by the Additional District Magistrate recommended a detailed technical investigation by a committee of experts. Despite this, no such committee was constituted by the state government. Rehabilitation and strengthening work was instead awarded in November 2019 to Freyssinet Menard India Pvt. Ltd. for ?2.69 crore, with a March 2021 completion deadline.

During its technical examination in February 2020, the agency uncovered major structural defects. A large PCC block had been placed at the expansion joint on the Kharal-end abutment, obstructing the thermal movement of the 22-metre suspended span. This blockage resulted in excessive horizontal pressure on the fixed bearings, causing cracks and pedestal damage.

Advertisement

Rs 14.75-cr loss to state

Barely five years after it opened, the Bhoothnath bridge collapsed under the weight of poor planning, weak oversight and faulty design

The CAG’s findings paint a troubling picture — missing approvals, substandard construction, ignored warnings and complete inaction even after clear structural red flags emerged

With Rs 14.75 crore wasted and a temporary bailey bridge now burdening commuters, the episode reflects a systemic failure where accountability, engineering rigour and public interest were sidelined at every stage

The firm also reported a significant detailing flaw: reinforcement anchorage at the articulation joint had been provided at only 300 mm instead of the required 1 metre for 20 mm bars. These findings, the CAG noted, point clearly to faulty design and substandard construction in the original project.

Further, th Chief Engineer, Mandi, highlighted that the contractor had failed to comply with key contract conditions. Yet, no action, disciplinary or financial, had been taken against either the contractor or departmental officials as of March 2023.

To manage traffic following the closure, a temporary one-way bailey bridge was constructed for Rs 2 crore, adding to the avoidable burden on the state exchequer. The audit also pointed to the absence of mandatory inspection records during construction, leaving no way to ascertain whether required quality checks were ever carried out.

The CAG concluded that poor scrutiny of design, weak quality control, failure to investigate the damaged structure and delays in rehabilitation defeated the main objective of easing congestion on the Kullu–Manali route and improving the movement of local produce. The audit findings were referred to the state government in April 2023, but no response had been received till October 2024.

Read what others don’t see with The Tribune Premium

  • Thought-provoking Opinions
  • Expert Analysis
  • Ad-free on web and app
  • In-depth Insights
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts