DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Careers Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Justice delayed: Rs 50 lakh lost to court stay in Palampur

Overhead tank dismantled in Palampur after prolonged legal proceedings dent exchequer

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
The dismantled overhead water tank in Palampur.
Advertisement

A prolonged legal stay spanning nearly two decades has caused a substantial loss to the public exchequer, after an overhead water tank project in Palampur had to be dismantled in a ruined condition. The stay, imposed by a court around 20 years ago, was vacated only recently, by which time the partially constructed structure had deteriorated beyond repair.

Advertisement

The overhead water tank, planned to strengthen the town’s drinking water infrastructure, remained exposed to the elements for years without any maintenance or protective measures. When the stay was finally lifted and construction was cleared to resume, technical assessments found the structure to be unsafe and structurally unsound. The Irrigation and Public Health (IPH) Department was left with no option but to dismantle the abandoned tank.

Advertisement

Officials confirmed that dismantling the damaged structure has resulted in a direct loss of nearly Rs 50 lakh to the public exchequer. They added that constructing a new overhead tank at the site would now require an additional expenditure exceeding Rs 50 lakh, effectively doubling the financial burden on taxpayers.

Advertisement

The episode has once again highlighted the heavy cost of delayed justice, weak project monitoring and the absence of accountability mechanisms to safeguard public assets during prolonged litigation. Experts point out that when such losses are repeated across multiple stalled projects, they cumulatively inflict significant damage on infrastructure development and erode public trust.

Public finance observers have called for a comprehensive audit of stalled government projects and the formulation of clear guidelines to protect partially completed works caught in lengthy court cases. There are also growing demands to fix responsibility on officials and contractors for allowing valuable public infrastructure to decay unchecked.

Advertisement

The case serves as a stark reminder that prolonged litigation and administrative delays do not merely halt development — they actively drain public resources and deprive citizens of essential services.

Read what others can’t with The Tribune Premium

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts