Supreme Court sets aside 'incomprehensible' Himachal HC verdict

Supreme Court sets aside 'incomprehensible' Himachal HC verdict

Tribune News Service

Satya Prakash

New Delhi, August 4

The Supreme Court has set aside an “utterly incomprehensible” verdict of the Himachal Pradesh High Court as it failed to understand the basis on which the decision was reached.

“The judgment of the High Court is utterly incomprehensible. The reasons on the basis of which the High Court has proceeded to allow the petitions and set aside the reassessment cannot be discerned from the judgments,” a Bench led by Justice DY Chandrachud said, setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court.

The Bench – which also included Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia – restored the three petitions to the Himachal Pradesh High Court and asked it to decide them afresh. “All the rights and contentions of the parties are kept open,” it said in its August 1 order.

The “utterly incomprehensible” judgment was delivered by a Division Bench of the Himachal Pradesh High Court on November 27, 2020, allowing writ petitions filed by Himachal Aluminium and Conductors challenging the validity of orders of reassessment passed by the state of Himachal Pradesh. The High Court had set aside the reassessment.

However, hearing an appeal filed by the state against the high court’s judgment, the top court failed to understand the reasons on the basis of which the High Court allowed the petitions and set aside the reassessment.

This is not the first time that the Supreme Court has faced such a problem with a verdict delivered by the high court. In January this year, it had taken exception to a verdict of the high court after it failed to comprehend the language used by it.

“Is this in Latin? We may have to send it back to the High Court for it to be re-written,” a Bench led by Justice KM Joseph had commented. “We are unable to understand a word,” senior advocate Nidhesh Gupta had said, agreeing with Justice Joseph.

In 2017, the top court was forced to set aside a Himachal Pradesh High Court verdict for its sheer inability to comprehend it due to poor quality of language in a tenant-landlord dispute. Such was the quality of the English language used in the high court’s verdict that even the lawyers representing both parties had failed to understand or assist the judges understand it.

Decide 3 petitions afresh, High Court told

The Bench, including Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, restored the three petitions to the Himachal Pradesh High Court and asked it to decide them afresh. “All the rights and contentions of the parties are kept open,” it said in its August 1 order.

#supreme court

Tribune Shorts


Top News

Nitish Kumar dumps BJP in Bihar to pave way for ‘Mahagathbandhan 2.0’ with RJD as largest party and key player

Nitish Kumar dumps BJP in Bihar to pave way for 'Mahagathbandhan 2.0' with RJD as largest party and key player

JD-U supremo to take oath as CM on Wednesday; BJP cries ‘bet...

Nitish Kumar as Opposition’s PM candidate in 2024? Many wary of his ‘U-turns’

Nitish Kumar as Opposition's PM candidate in 2024? Many wary of his 'U-turns'

RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav had derisively named Kumar as ‘pal...

All in a day: Timeline for Bihar's change of government

All in a day: Timeline for Bihar's change of government

MPs, MLAs of RJD and JD(U) held parallel meetings

Maharashtra CM Eknath Shinde to expand 2-member ministry today

No woman in 20-member cabinet as Maharashtra CM Shinde expands 41-day-old ministry

18 MLAs, including state BJP president Chandrakant Patil, we...

PM Modi’s total assets rise by Rs 26 lakh to Rs 2.23 crore; land-holding donated

PM Modi's total assets rise by Rs 26 lakh to Rs 2.23 crore; land-holding donated

He has no investment in any bond, share or mutual funds, doe...

Cities

View All