DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Careers Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Aviation hit safety ceiling; Ahmedabad crash sent shockwaves

Looking back at aviation sector's trajectory in 2025

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
In one of the worst aviation tragedies, 241 people on board AI Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner aircraft were killed during the plane crash in June. File
Advertisement

The Indian civil aviation sector spent 2025 celebrating scale until it turned into strain. A fatal Air India crash, weeks of mass cancellations at IndiGo, and a long-delayed regulatory crackdown on pilot fatigue combined to expose an industry that had grown faster than its safety buffers.

Advertisement

What unfolded over the year was not a series of isolated crises, but a systemic reckoning, one that forced regulators, airlines and passengers to confront the cost of postponed decisions.

Advertisement

Pak airspace closure proved costly

The illusion of control cracked early. In April, geopolitical tensions following the Pahalgam terror attack triggered the closure of Pakistani airspace to Indian carriers, forcing airlines into longer, costlier routings on international sectors.

Advertisement

For Air India, which was rebuilding its global network under an ambitious turnaround plan, the closure disrupted schedules, inflated fuel bills and eroded operational predictability. Flights to Europe and North America were stretched by hours, exposing how external shocks can quickly destabilise tightly calibrated airline networks.

Boeing crash exposed regulatory gaps

The year’s most devastating blow came in June. On June 12, Air India Flight 171, a Boeing 787-8 bound for London Gatwick, crashed seconds after take-off from Ahmedabad, killing 241 of the 242 people on board and 19 on the ground.

Advertisement

Preliminary findings by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau indicated that both fuel control switches moved from ‘run’ to ‘cut-off’ shortly after take-off, leading to a dual engine shutdown.

Although the report didn’t assign blame, it deepened the mystery as these switches typically require manual lifting and pulling to operate, with audio suggesting pilot confusion. While the final report is awaited, the early focus on cockpit actions sent tremors through the aviation community across the world.

The crash reopened uncomfortable questions around human factors, cockpit workload and mental health oversight. At a time when airlines are expanding fleets, compressing training timelines and integrating complex operations, the tragedy exposed a regulatory gap that had received far less attention than aircraft and infrastructure.

IndiGo cancellations created chaos

If June brought tragedy, December delivered chaos. India’s largest airline, IndiGo, saw its operations unravel during the winter schedule. Flight cancellations mounted rapidly from early December.

By the time the airline announced on December 9 that operations were stabilising, around 4,200 flights had already been cancelled, according to the industry data. The peak came on December 5, with about 1,600 cancellations in a single day, while on-time performance at major airports collapsed into single digits.

IndiGo’s disruption coincided with the full enforcement of the Directorate General of Civil Aviation’s revised Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR) on Flight Duty Time Limitations, designed to curb pilot fatigue.

These rules were neither sudden nor secret. Notified earlier and phased in from July, they became fully effective in November.

For years, airlines had warned that stricter fatigue norms would hurt capacity, while regulators delayed implementation. When enforcement finally arrived, schedules built on dense rotations and minimal recovery margins became non-compliant overnight.

The result was a public unravelling of a business model optimised for maximum utilisation. Pilot unions accused IndiGo of operating with lean manpower even as capacity expanded, leaving no buffer when stricter norms kicked in.

The airline rejected the charge, but acknowledged that compliance with the new CAR materially constrained operations.

Under mounting pressure, the DGCA granted temporary relaxations from certain provisions until February 2026 and ordered the airline to cut 10 per cent of its planned capacity. Safety experts warned that such exemptions risked weakening the very protections the rules were meant to enforce.

Expansion marred by op vulnerabilities, staff crunch

Beyond the airlines, 2025 exposed stress across the aviation ecosystem. Parliament was informed of GPS interference incidents near Indian airspace, highlighting emerging operational vulnerabilities.

Meanwhile, the DGCA struggled with staffing constraints even as its oversight responsibilities multiplied with fleet growth, new airports and rising flight movements.

All this played out against the backdrop of relentless expansion – The Navi Mumbai International Airport commenced commercial operations, regional connectivity grew, while passenger numbers continued to climb.

On paper, Indian aviation looked unstoppable. In reality, the year revealed a widening gap between physical infrastructure and institutional readiness.

Legal reforms, including the implementation of the Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam and stronger aircraft leasing protections, modernised the framework. But 2025 demonstrated that laws and airports cannot compensate for delayed enforcement, thin safety margins and an industry conditioned to absorb risk quietly.

Read what others can’t with The Tribune Premium

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts