icon
DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Careers Advertise with us Classifieds
GenZ Speak Up !
Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Bengal polls: Calcutta HC sets aside appointment of assistant professors as presiding officers

Court holds that authorities failed to produce any document to show unavoidable circumstances based on which the appointments were made

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
An election official demonstrates the functioning of Electronic Voting Machine and Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail during a training programme for women polling officials ahead of Assembly elections, in Suri, Birbhum district of West Bengal, April 17, 2026. PTI
Advertisement

The Calcutta High Court has set aside the appointment of some assistant professors as presiding officers by the Election Commission for the two-phase Assembly elections in West Bengal.

Advertisement

The petitioners, belonging to the West Bengal Government College Teachers' Association, filed the application, challenging their appointment as presiding officers in polling booths for the Assembly polls scheduled on April 23 and 29.

Advertisement

The petitioners claimed that they are holding posts of assistant professors, but have been assigned the work of presiding officers without considering their pay level.

Advertisement

Justice Krishna Rao set aside and quashed the appointments of the professors, who are the petitioners, as presiding officers for the state Assembly election, holding that the authorities failed to produce any document to show the unavoidable circumstances based on which the appointments were made.

The court said on Friday that the assistant professors have been appointed as presiding officers in violation of a circular of the Election Commission dated February 16, 2010.

Advertisement

Their lawyer Shamim Ahmed said that there are more than 300 members of the association, which moved the court, and said the order was applicable to the petitioners only.

In their plea, the petitioners claimed that the circular on requisition of staff for election purposes mentioned that Group A equivalent senior officers, including teaching staff of universities, colleges, etc., should not be drafted for duties in polling station premises without “specific reasons to be recorded in writing by the District Election Officer where such appointments become unavoidable”.

The counsel for the Election Commission submitted before the court that there are approximately 90,000 booths to conduct the election on April 23 and April 29, and as such, it is not possible for the authorities to prepare the seniority list, and there might be some overlapping.

Read what others can’t with The Tribune Premium

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts