Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Supreme Court raps UP Govt for delay in POCSO case

‘Examine victim or will call Home Secy’

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Advertisement

New Delhi, July 4

Advertisement

The Supreme Court has pulled up the UP Government for failing to comply with its order on examination of a minor victim of sexual assault under the POCSO Act by June 30.

Giving one week to the prosecution to examine the victim in the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act case, a Vacation Bench of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice A Amanullah warned that it would summon the state Home Secretary, if the order was not complied with.

“Our order was a mandatory order, it was to be followed in letter and spirit. We are not passing orders just for fun,” Justice Amanullah told senior advocate Garima Prasad, who represented the UP Government.

Advertisement

“We are seeing it happening day in and day out….every state counsel is taking our orders casually. If it is not done within one week, we will call your Home Secretary here. We are at fault for letting these things happen….the fault is on our part. The message has to go (out),” the Bench said while hearing a bail plea of a man accused of raping a 16-year-old girl.

The top court’s comments came after Prasad sought adjournment on the ground that the victim’s evidence could not be recorded as there was a condolence meeting in the trial court.

Advertisement
Tags :
SupremeCourt
Show comments
Advertisement