icon
DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Careers Advertise with us Classifieds
GenZ Speak Up !
Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Supreme Court disposes of wife’s plea challenging Sonam Wangchuk’s detention

Bench said there was nothing left in the matter

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Climate activist Sonam Wangchuk with spouse Gitanjali J Angmo. FILE
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Monday disposed of a petition filed by Gitanjali J Angmo challenging the detention of her husband, activist Sonam Wangchuk, under the National Security Act (NSA), 1980. Wangchuk had been lodged in Jodhpur Jail following violent protests in Leh in September 2025.

Advertisement

A Bench led by Justice Aravind Kumar noted that the Centre had already revoked Wangchuk’s detention and there was nothing left in the matter.

Advertisement

Earlier, the top court had asked the Centre whether it would reconsider Wangchuk’s detention in view of his health condition. The government had declined to do so at the time.

Advertisement

However, on March 14, the Centre revoked Wangchuk’s detention with immediate effect, leading to his release from Jodhpur Jail.

The activist was detained on September 26, 2025, under Section 3(2) of the NSA, two days after protests demanding statehood for Ladakh and Sixth Schedule status turned violent, leaving four people dead and nearly 100 injured.

Advertisement

The NSA empowers the Centre and state governments to detain individuals to prevent them from acting in a manner “prejudicial to the defence of India”. The maximum detention period is 12 months, though it can be revoked earlier.

On January 29, Wangchuk had denied inciting supporters to overthrow the government, rejecting comparisons with the Arab Spring and asserting his democratic right to criticise and protest.

However, the Centre and the Ladakh Administration had sought to justify Wangchuk’s detention, saying he was detained for instigating people in a sensitive border area.

Read what others can’t with The Tribune Premium

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts