Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

High Court seeks inquiry into irregularities in IKGPTU appointments

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the Registrar of IK Gujral Punjab Technical University (IKGPTU) to conduct a detailed inquiry into alleged irregularities in the recruitment of Technical Assistants. The order was passed by Justice NS Shekhawat in a civil writ petition filed by social activist Amardeep Gujral, who sought examination of the university’s hiring process and adherence to statutory norms.

Advertisement

According to the petition, several recruitment steps were allegedly carried out in deviation of the university’s approved procedures. The petitioner submitted that eligibility criteria were altered without approval of the Board of Governors and that interviews were conducted despite state instructions discouraging interviews for certain categories of posts. Concerns were also raised regarding the conduct of the written test, evaluation process and constitution of the selection committee. Requests for information under the Right to Information Act were reported to have remained unanswered.

Advertisement

After hearing the matter, the court instructed to decide the petitioner’s pending representation dated August 30, 2025 by issuing a speaking and reasoned order within three months. The court also allowed the petitioner 10 days to place additional material on record. If the allegations are found valid, the court directed that appropriate consequential action be taken in accordance with law.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement