Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Posted at: Jan 19, 2019, 6:41 AM; last updated: Jan 19, 2019, 6:41 AM (IST)

Dassault laughing all the way to the bank: Chidambaram

Dassault laughing all the way to the bank: Chidambaram
Congress leader P Chidambaram at a press meet. Photo: Mukesh Aggarwal

Tribune News Service
New Delhi, January 18

The Congress today cited new facts to reiterate its demand for a joint parliamentary committee probe into the Rafale jet purchase, saying the government was wrong if it thought the issue had been given a quiet burial. 

The controversy is very much alive and has acquired a new dimension, the party said days after Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman rejected the JPC demand in the Lok Sabha. Sitharaman said the issue must rest after the Supreme Court dismissed all anti-Rafale purchase petitions having “satisfied its conscience” on the process, pricing and procedure involved in the inter-government Rafale agreement between India and France.

Addressing reporters today, Congress veteran P Chidambaram said a JPC was needed to probe the issue in the light of new facts as “Dassault was laughing all the way to the bank”. We have always said the court cannot probe this issue, Chidambaram said accusing the Government of wronging the nation on two counts.

“Firstly, the government compromised national security by denying the Indian Air Force 90 fighter aircraft that they desperately need. Secondly, it has purchased two squadrons that will cost about Euro 25 million more per aircraft. At the 2016 exchange rate this enhanced cost is equal to Rs 186 crore! India will pay Rs 186 crore more per aircraft,” Chidambaram said referring to a media report claiming Prime Minister Narendra Modi bought the jets at a much higher price than what was negotiated by the Congress-led UPA.


All readers are invited to post comments responsibly. Any messages with foul language or inciting hatred will be deleted. Comments with all capital letters will also be deleted. Readers are encouraged to flag the comments they feel are inappropriate.
The views expressed in the Comments section are of the individuals writing the post. The Tribune does not endorse or support the views in these posts in any manner.
Share On