L-G vs Delhi Govt: Centre wants issue referred to Supreme Court's larger Bench : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

L-G vs Delhi Govt: Centre wants issue referred to Supreme Court's larger Bench

L-G vs Delhi Govt: Centre wants issue referred to Supreme Court's larger Bench

The Delhi Government on Wednesday sought a clear “demarcation” of its powers with regard to control over bureaucracy in the national Capital even as the Centre urged the Supreme Court to refer the issue to a larger Bench. - File photo



Tribune News Service

New Delhi, January 18

The Delhi Government on Wednesday sought a clear “demarcation” of its powers with regard to control over bureaucracy in the national Capital even as the Centre urged the Supreme Court to refer the issue to a larger Bench. A five-Judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud – which reserved its verdict on the issue — expressed surprise at Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta’s request to refer the issue of tussle between the Lt-Governor and the elected government for control over ‘services’ to a larger Bench. As the Bench assembled, Mehta said, “I have already filed an application seeking reference. I have already argued the point. I am seeking permission to file a written note”.

The CJI told Mehta: “But we did not hear any argument on reference! It was never argued… “Mr Solicitor, now you can’t... Dr (AM) Singhvi (representing Delhi Government) is in his rejoinder (responding to Centre’s arguments). Reference has to be argued at the outset.”

The SG responded: “The reference is on the ground that the contours of federalism between the Union and the Union Territory require a relook. I am not repeating anything. It’s covered in my arguments. I just need to put a two-page note.”

The Centre has sought a larger Bench reference on the ground that the 2018 Constitution Bench verdict interpreting Article 239 AA of the Constitution and laying down powers of the Delhi Government was not in tune with an earlier nine-Judge Constitution Bench verdict in NDMC vs State of Punjab (1996) in which it was held that Delhi was on the same footing as a Union Territory.

“I hope the boundaries are clearly demarcated in black and white this time,” Singhvi submitted. Describing Mehta’s arguments as ‘ambush’ argument to derail days of arguments, Singhvi said, “It is unfortunate that the Centre is advancing reference to larger Bench argument, of which not a whisper was made during the long arguments…This will be hugely dilatory.” But Mehta maintained it could be anything but dilatory.

About The Author

The Tribune News Service brings you the latest news, analysis and insights from the region, India and around the world. Follow the Tribune News Service for a wide-ranging coverage of events as they unfold, with perspective and clarity.

#supreme court


Top News

Lok Sabha elections: Voting begins in 21 states for 102 seats in Phase 1

Lok Sabha elections 2024: Around 60 per cent turnout recorded till 5 pm, stray incidents of violence in Bengal Lok Sabha elections 2024: Around 60 per cent turnout recorded till 5 pm, stray incidents of violence in Bengal

Minor EVM glitches reported at some booths in Tamil Nadu, Ar...

Chhattisgarh: CRPF jawan on poll duty killed in accidental explosion of grenade launcher shell

Chhattisgarh: CRPF jawan on poll duty killed in accidental explosion of grenade launcher shell

The incident took place near Galgam village under Usoor poli...

Lok Sabha Election 2024: What do voting percentage and other trends signify?

Lok Sabha elections 2024: What do voting percentage and other trends signify

A high voter turnout is generally read as anti-incumbency ag...


Cities

View All