SC: Prosecution under IT Act’s Sec 66A shocking : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

SC: Prosecution under IT Act’s Sec 66A shocking

NEW DELHI: Taking exception to prosecution of people under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act declared unconstitutional by it in 2015, the Supreme Court today warned that it would send erring official to jail for violating its orders.

SC: Prosecution under IT Act’s Sec 66A  shocking


Tribune News Service

New Delhi, January 7

Taking exception to prosecution of people under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act declared unconstitutional by it in 2015, the Supreme Court today warned that it would send erring official to jail for violating its orders.

“It’s shocking that people are still being prosecuted for a provision which was scrapped by this court in 2015. If that is the case, then we will send all officials concerned to jail,” a Bench headed by Justice Rohinton F Nariman said.

The Bench, which also included Justice Vineet Sharan, issued notice to the Centre on a PIL filed by People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), asking it to respond in four weeks.

PUCL counsel Sanjay Parikh said prosecutions were taking place under Section 66A even after it was struck down in March 2015 and more than 22 prosecutions have taken place since then. It has sought issuance of appropriate circulars and advisories to all states and UTs for immediate compliance of the verdict.

Acting on a PIL filed by Shreya Singhal, the SC had, on March 24, declared unconstitutional Section 66A of the IT Act that gave sweeping powers to the police to arrest people for posting “annoying” or “offensive” comments online.

Justice Nariman was there in that Bench which said the controversial section curtailed a citizen’s constitutional right to freedom of speech and expression.

Section 66A of the IT Act made sending such messages a crime punishable by up to three years in prison.

“We hold the section unconstitutional on the grounds that it takes within its sweep protected speech that is innocent in nature. It is liable to have a chilling effect on free speech and, therefore, has to be struck down,” the top court had said.

The provision hit headlines after two girls—Shaheen Dhada and Rinu Shrinivasan—were arrested at Palghar in Maharashtra’s Thane district for posting something online against the shutdown in Mumbai following Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s death.

“Despite the clear and unequivocal holding of this court in Shreya Singhal case, Section 66A of the IT Act continues to be applied in the legal system. A recent working paper by the Internet Freedom Foundation demonstrates that pending prosecutions under Section 66A of the IT Act have not been terminated, and further that it continues to be invoked by police across India in FIRs registered after the verdict,” the PUCL said in its petition.

Top News

'When government changes...': Rahul Gandhi after Rs 1,800 crore fresh I-T notice to Congress

'When government changes...': Rahul Gandhi after Rs 1,800 crore fresh I-T notice to Congress

The Congress leader accuses the BJP of indulging in ‘tax ter...

Chief Judicial Magistrate's court in UP's Banda orders judicial inquiry into death of gangster-politician Mukhtar Ansari

UP court orders judicial probe into gangster-politician Mukhtar Ansari’s death, seeks report in a month

Ghazipur MP Afzal Ansari on Tuesday alleged that his brother...

‘Heart attack or poisoning’: The life and times of Mukhtar Ansari—crime and politics

‘Heart attack or poisoning’: The life and times of Mukhtar Ansari—crime and politics

Eastern parts of Uttar Pradesh are among the poorest regions...

CBI files chargesheet against 20 institutes, 105 individuals in Himachal Pradesh multi-crore scholarship scam

CBI files chargesheet against 20 institutes, 105 individuals in Himachal Pradesh multi-crore scholarship scam

22 educational institutions were on CBI radar in the scholar...


Cities

View All